Search for: "In Re John H"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 8:00 pm
I am writing specifically about John Kluksdal. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
” In re Lowry, 138 N.Y.S.3d at 241-2. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 8:00 pm
Car accidents can be overwhelming and confusing, especially when you’re certain the accident wasn’t your fault. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3] Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Dombalagian (who did not participate in In re Apple Securities Litigation), the John B. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 3:58 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
They’re watching. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court articulated the meaning of materiality in cases in the 1970s and 1980s.[6] It is this standard of materiality that is reflected in Commission rules.[7] It is this same materiality standard that appears in numerous disclosure rules governing registration statements and public company annual reports.[8] It is this same materiality standard that is used throughout the final rules we’re considering today. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Harold H. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:26 am
Graham, a professor at Indiana University’s Paul H. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Brandeis and John Hessin Clarke to the Court. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
For starters, precluding a party from re-litigating an issue may be justified only if that party had adequate incentive and opportunity to fully contest the issue in the original litigation. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:28 am
§ 512(h). [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
" Mitchell insisted, "No, we're not giving it up at all. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:06 am
Mann's attorney also told the NYT they still plan to appeal the prior decisions that had removed CEI and National Review from the case: "Asked about Competitive Enterprise Institute and National Review, John Williams said, 'They're next.'" * * * A post-script. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:22 am
On this, Professors Robert Delahunty and John Yoo agree with Pence. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 4:49 am
In re Brunvoll and Associates LLC, Serial No. 90526989 (January 31, 2024) [Not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Robert H. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 8:24 pm
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free"(John 8:32 (KJV). [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 10:14 pm
& John E. [read post]
