Search for: "In Re Johnson" Results 561 - 580 of 6,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2015, 3:54 am
HANSON for "Hand tools, namely, chalk line reels; Hand tools, namely, squares; Hand-operated sharpening tools and instruments; Hand-operated tin snips; Pliers; Snips," in view of the registered mark HANSON for "Die taps and die sets, taps and tap sets, all the foregoing for use with machine tools," and "Hand tools, namely, wrenches, and accessories for wrenches, namely, die taps and die sets, taps and tap sets"].February 24, 2015 - 2 PM: In re Campagnolo… [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:14 pm by CAPTAIN
Kind of like "if you're not guilty, you should have no reason to want a lawyer. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 2:04 pm
Johnson & Johnson (J&J) is suing the American Red Cross (ARC) for trademark violations. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:49 pm
 President Johnson wouldn't run for re-election. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:11 pm
"So sayeth Judge O'Scannlain, albeit more formally, in this opinion, which holds that unless you're actually innocent, the Schulp gateway ain't helping you much. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:09 am
” We’re not sure, frankly, what happened to all the lawyers of the firm formerly known as VLG. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 2:34 pm
" Said Phil Mickelson, quoted in "Dustin Johnson quits PGA, joins Phil Mickelson on Saudi-backed tour" (WaPo). [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 10:30 am
  Here letter states: Administrator Johnson issued the document without legal authority under the Clean Air Act, and in spite of the clear opinion of the EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board in In re: Deseret Power Electric Cooperative, PSD Appeal No. 07-03 (EAB November 13, 2008). [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:25 pm by David Lat
Say what you will about these folks, but at least they're interesting. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 7:37 pm by Jeff Gamso
  And so, Missouri could have said to the court,"OK, in the interests of common decency and since we're already committed to a course that will certainly damage the kid maybe we can just let it slide and agree that, as applied to Johnson's kid this is unconstitutional. [read post]