Search for: "In Re LaPinska"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2022, 4:41 pm
” (In re LaPinska (1978), 72 Ill.2d 461, 473.)'” In re Levin (1987), 118 Ill.2d 77, 87, quoting In re Crisel (1984), 101 Ill.2d 332, 343. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:34 am
Last year, Lapinskas embarked on his most ambitious project yet: a housing unit meant to “immerse” prisoners preparing to re-enter society in the challenge they were about to face. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:14 am
In examining the evidence, we bear in mind the Supreme Court's observation in In re LaPinska, 72 Ill. 2d 461, 469, 381 N.E.2d 700 (1978), that "[t]he rule against representing conflicting interests is a rigid one, designed not alone to prevent the dishonest practitioner from fraudulent conduct, but as well to preclude the honest practitioner from putting himself in a position where he may be required to choose between conflicting duties. [read post]
