Search for: "In Re MacKlem"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2012, 1:15 pm
It be might because we're importing low-wage, no benefits Irish or Chinese workers to steal jobs from young Canadians. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 11:08 am
Zahr Said: Precision about what we’re trying to protect is useful! [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 9:09 am
Lisa Macklem, We Love What You’re Doing… Now Stop or We’ll Sue Examples: Axanar; unofficial Bridgerton musical; Fleetwood Mac retweeted a video of a man using his skateboard to ride down highway drinking cranberry juice and playing “Dreams”; users managed backlash against Dungeons and Dragons planned rule changes requiring payment for things like podcasts. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:09 pm
bid=8102443 LAW LIBRARY level 3: K3240 .M3215 2015Patrick Macklem, The Sovereignty of Human Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015). [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:37 pm
ASCAP’s contracts didn’t allow partial withdrawal: voluntary, but if you’re in you’re all in. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 5:33 am
Meanwhile, the rhetoric now features an attempt to re-interpret the Supreme Court’s 2021 Access Copyright v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 6:28 am
After re-affirming the importance of the copyright balance and fair dealing, the court notes: In other words, contrary to the Federal Court of Appeal’s view, in the educational context it is not only the institutional perspective that matters. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
Lisa Macklem: Concerned about people taking advantage of fans/feeding at the trough? [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:46 am
But what is the problem we’re trying to solve here—what harm will happen if we don’t protect these costumes with ©? [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 11:49 am
Then the dissent says you’re overriding congressional policy by applying fair use. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
“Veni, vidi, vici”: Julius Caesar, 47 BC The more than ten-year-old effort by Access Copyright (“AC”) to impose a “mandatory tariff” through the Copyright Board on Canadian educational institutions is over in a quick, decisive, and devastating unanimous judgment from Justice Rosalie Abellaof the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”). 85 years of legislative policy and SCC jurisprudence are re-affirmed, vindicated, and continued. [read post]
