Search for: "In Re Marriage of Paul"
Results 261 - 280
of 352
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 6:44 am
DOMA is both a burden and a benefit to gay couples: on the one hand, they're excluded from certain government benefits; on the other, two-income couples save thousands of dollars a year in federal taxes from the marriage penalty. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:08 pm
People in the White House complain about the idiots in Congress, and the idiots in Congress complain about the idiots in the White House — especially if they’re in the same party. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:26 am
Now add the Honorable Paul C. [read post]
28 May 2010, 1:34 pm
The Union Tribune reports that a group named Better Courts Now is targeting four sitting judges in San Diego in an attempt to replace them with judges who reflect the group's more conservative stances on gay marriage and abortion. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:03 am
The Rumor Mill News Reading Room Big Thanks Re: TomFloccoSends WMR: BREAKING! [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
Foreign marriages are only recognised if they meet this definition. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm
It’s possible KYEstates readers are focused on the Paul-Grayson Senate race, or the Louisville mayoral race (see latest polls here, and here, respectively). [read post]
11 May 2010, 12:52 pm
Other blogs love the announcement of a Supreme Court nominee, but we're sort of "whatever. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:03 pm
When you read the words “This is a provocative book” in a review, you know you’re in the presence of a mixed compliment. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:16 pm
In Re Commitment of N.N., 146 N.J. 112, 134 (1996). [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
Ray Suarez talks to Marcia Coyle of the National Law Journal for more on both cases and on retiring Justice John Paul Stevens' final day hearing arguments. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
The California Supreme Court squashed the practice in about 30-days, voiding all the marriage licenses issued as a result of Gavin's project.In a May 2008 change of course, the California Supreme Court decided (4-3) the case known as In Re Marriage Cases, holding that any California laws, "that treat persons differently because of their sexual orientation should be subjected to strict scrutiny... [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
The California Supreme Court squashed the practice in about 30-days, voiding all the marriage licenses issued as a result of Gavin's project.In a May 2008 change of course, the California Supreme Court decided (4-3) the case known as In Re Marriage Cases, holding that any California laws, "that treat persons differently because of their sexual orientation should be subjected to strict scrutiny... [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 11:01 am
Committee Republicans have portrayed Liu as a leftist for his support of same-sex marriage, affirmative action, and the Constitution as an evolving source of individual rights. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
Criminal LawK5018 .C753 2009Criminal law conversations / edited by Paul H. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 8:03 am
Paul K. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:54 am
It’s just the person that the deceased was living with in a conjugal relationship outside of marriage or a spouse. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:00 am
She represented San Francisco in In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (Cal. 2008) and Strauss v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:58 am
Does this indicate that state legislators in Maryland really don't value marriage as an institution that highly? [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:27 am
Republicans Channel Paul Revere: "The Liberals Are Coming, the Liberals Are Coming! [read post]
