Search for: "In Re Marriage of Paul" Results 141 - 160 of 411
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at a proposal by retired Justice John Paul Stevens for a constitutional amendment addressing state sovereign immunity; Re contends that “thereis something quite surprising about Stevens’s proposal: if read according to its terms, it might not have any significant effect at all. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Then there is the National Organization for Marriage, which “promote[s] an understanding of marriage as the union of one man and one woman. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
United States, the Armed Career Criminal Act case in which the Court ordered re-argument in January. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:38 am by Alan J. Borsuk
The title of Paul Taylor’s recent book refers to “a looming generational showdown” as America changes. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:35 pm
In the case In Re: Paul Ruitenberg III, a divorcing couple decided to file for Chapter 7 independently. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:06 pm by Joe Patrice
Amazingly, they're trying to use his sculpture in their trademark application. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissent from the denial of certiorari in Plumley v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:02 am by Jim Sedor
Mike Hubbard was re-elected as speaker of the Alabama House, despite being indicted on nearly two-dozen felony corruption charges. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:09 am by Staci Zaretsky
" Remember, when you're given the chance to make history, you better hope that you're on the right side of it. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:56 pm
Churched: One Kid's Journey Toward God Despite a Holy Mess by Matthew Paul Turner (2008)42. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:15 am by Amy Howe
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re continues his posts on last Term’s decision in Lexmark International v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
  If I understand Missouri law correctly, the formal standard for recusal present a high bar — mandatory recual is limited to situations where “the prosecuting attorney and assistant prosecuting attorney be interested or shall have been employed as counsel in any case where such employment is inconsistent with the duties of his or her office, or shall be related to the defendant in any criminal prosecution, either by blood or by marriage . . . . [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:23 am by Staci Zaretsky
” [New York Daily News] * Howrey going to get money back when judges keep tossing unfinished business claims like they’re yesterday’s trash? [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:09 am by Staci Zaretsky
Probably when you’re planning to file a massive class-action suit against the MLB on behalf of minor leaguers. [read post]
28 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
He was instrumental, however, in persuading Congress to later re-enact RFRA limited to federal law, without any exceptions for the federal anti-discrimination laws. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit earlier this month, Judge Paul Niemeyer sounded unlikely to vote to sustain the district court’s ruling invalidating Virginia’s SSM ban. [read post]