Search for: "In Re Marriage of Perry" Results 1 - 20 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2010, 5:45 pm by Michael Ginsborg
They believe that they must prevent the risk of a ruling, like In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (Cal. 2008), that would invalidate the state DOMA. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:20 pm by Record on Appeal
On April 13, 2011, marriage equality opponents filed a motion in the Ninth Circuit.  [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 2:12 pm by Deborah Wald
  But since the Windsor and Perry decisions, I have been receiving so many questions that it clearly is time to blog again. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
The California Supreme Court squashed the practice in about 30-days, voiding all the marriage licenses issued as a result of Gavin's project.In a May 2008 change of course, the California Supreme Court decided (4-3) the case known as In Re Marriage Cases, holding that any California laws, "that treat persons differently because of their sexual orientation should be subjected to strict scrutiny..."   [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The California Supreme Court squashed the practice in about 30-days, voiding all the marriage licenses issued as a result of Gavin's project.In a May 2008 change of course, the California Supreme Court decided (4-3) the case known as In Re Marriage Cases, holding that any California laws, "that treat persons differently because of their sexual orientation should be subjected to strict scrutiny..."   [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:30 pm by Rumpole
Perry, which examines whether the State of California violated the Due Process clause when voters enacted a law that prohibited Gay Marriage. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:44 am by Michael Ginsborg
I am preparing my "Perry roundups" in an abbreviated format, providing just the title, date, and source of each article. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm by Marty Lederman
  If you’re inclined to read them, they’re available at the SCOTUSblog case pages–just click on the links provided in the previous sentence. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:16 am by John Eastman
Both Chief Justice Marshall in Goodridge and Judge Walker in Perry acknowledged that the new definition they were giving to marriage was not rooted at all in our history and traditions, much less deeply rooted.  [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Perry, the case from California involving Proposition 8 (the voter-enacted ban on same-sex marriages in the Golden State), I offer below a few thoughts on what to expect and what to look for in the Court’s ruling. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:08 pm by Lawrence Solum
Review of Law & Social Change Symposium “Making Constitutional Change: the Past, Present, and Future Role of Perry v. [read post]