Search for: "In Re Marriage of Powers" Results 81 - 100 of 2,033
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2010, 8:47 am by Money Maven
Though we've been increasing our earning power, women are still earning just 78 cents for every dollar a man takes home. [read post]
18 May 2008, 9:43 pm
Words  and nomenclature are powerful expressions of status in our society. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:24 pm by Steve Sanders
By imposing civil unions and barring marriage, even if the two statuses offer the same benefits and obligations on paper except for the powerful “M” word, the government is forcing same-sex couples to explain the difference in theirdaily lives. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:31 pm
” (In re Marriage of Flaherty (1982) 31 Cal.3d 637, 650-651.) [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 4:21 pm
Religious organizations have been powerful forces against gay marriage everywhere. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am by Steven Calabresi
As I shall explain further below, I do think the federal Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional because Congress did not have the enumerated power to adopt a federal marriage statute. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 8:58 pm
In re Marriage of Duggan offers good analysis by the Second District Illinois Appellate Court of two issues that have been confounding the appellate and family law bars. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm by Michelle O'Neil
Maybe the Texas Supreme Court is reading this opinion right now and thinking about deciding the Texas state case In re J.B. out of the Dallas court on the validity of same-sex marriages and the right of Texas to grant a same-sex divorce. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 5:54 pm
Senator from Wisconsin, responding to a question about the consequences of the same-sex marriage case. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:05 pm
So if we’re going to ask whether there is an originalist argument for same-sex marriage, I think it’s helpful to stay at least somewhat connected to the public understanding of the term. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:47 pm by Kirk Jenkins
This morning, a unanimous Illinois Supreme Court strongly reaffirmed the "leveling the playing field" rules of the Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act in In re Marriage of Earlywine. [read post]
When you’re in the process of preparing for marriage, just about everyone has some token of advice. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:21 pm by Benjamin Wittes
FISA, for example, is not everyone’s cup of tea, but it is a dense set of rules that prohibits certain types of abuses we’re particularly afraid of. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 8:23 am
We're still saying what X is "by definition" after all these years of scoffing at the anti-same-sex-marriage people who kept saying, tediously, marriage is by definition between a man and a woman? [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:00 am by Laura Orr
Oregon State Bar Information and Referral Service and our “How to Find a Lawyer in Oregon” guide (also from the website if that link frustrates).* For more about Oregon short-term (of limited duration) marriage, see "In re: Complaint as to the Conduct of MAGAR E. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:37 pm by Jon McLaughlin
In re Marriage of Iqbal Illinois Appellate Court http://www.illinoiscourts.gov/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2014/2ndDistrict/2131306.pdf Postnuptial agreement (PNA) signed by parties was unenforceable as it violates public policy. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 3:05 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 In In re Marriage of Burgess, the Court authorized a guardian to continue a divorce action began before the ward became disabled (although a guardian could still not initiate a divorce), noting the “broad” description of the guardian’s powers found in the Act. [read post]