Search for: "In Re Marriage of Williams"
Results 301 - 320
of 502
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2012, 9:21 am
2011AP747 In re the marriage of: Taylor v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
In fact, the Williams Institute reports that as of late last year, more than 150,000 gay couples have been married in the U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 5:58 pm
They learn they’re in the woods outside Jaffa in the Holy Land. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:39 pm
Marshall does not apply to claims at issue -- Even if it were determined that bankruptcy court lacks authority to enter final orders because trustee's fraudulent transfer claims are merely “related to” bankruptcy, court may still enter final orders because Section 157(c)(2), provides that a bankruptcy judge can issue final judgments in non-core proceedings if parties consent, and IRS explicitly and impliedly consented to bankruptcy court's final resolution of claims at issue --… [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 5:57 am
Elaine Quijano.Maryland House of Delegates approved same sex marriage. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:02 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0166, 2012 MT 25, IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF LAURIE F. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm
They’re the ying and yang of football. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:58 pm
It is up to us to convince you that there's probable cause to bring William Paul Gardner to trial. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 3:53 pm
Credit Suisse’s view puts it at odds with Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William C. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 4th District.Criminal law -- Counsel -- Ineffectiveness -- Defendant convicted of sexual battery by digital penetration and oral penetration of a child under 12 after two counts for lewd or lascivious molestation against a second victim were severed subsequent to the jury being informed of the crimes, and second victim was permitted to testify as a Williams Rule witness -- Ineffectiveness was apparent on the face of the record, and no conceivable tactical… [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 8:37 am
Perhaps it was their financial difficulties that put too much strain on their marriage, it certainly couldn’t have helped. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:49 pm
It does not apply to disputes about transactions that occurred before the marriage. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:01 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) Before I get to the last phase of my stint here, I thought it would be helpful for me to address one recurring theme in the comments. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:26 am
Notice that as a matter of legal theory and doctrine the question we’re asking here isn’t necessarily marriage-specific. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 9:07 am
When you’re going to serve on the Court . . . for the rest of your productive days you accustom yourself to the institution like you do to the institution of marriage, and you realize that you can’t be in a brawl every day and still get any satisfaction out of life. – Chief Justice Earl Warren (1972) I have read my share of books on the Supreme Court and its history. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:32 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) A number of commenters have asked about the relationship between law and marriage. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 3:52 pm
” — William A. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 3:52 pm
” — William A. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Business and Constitutional Originalism in the Roberts Court Vikram D. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 9:07 am
Do not allow this man to ever be re-elected again. [read post]
