Search for: "In Re Marriage of Williams" Results 321 - 340 of 508
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 3:32 pm by William Baude, guest-blogging
(William Baude, guest-blogging) A number of commenters have asked about the relationship between law and marriage. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am by Jasmine Joseph
Business and Constitutional Originalism in the Roberts Court Vikram D. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by Peter Huang
Psychologist William James pointed out, "[s]election is the very keel on which our mental ship is built. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by EEM
If you are, then please pass on a URL for me to post when you're done! [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm by Law Lady
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida.Bankruptcy -- Sanctions -- Violation of automatic stay and discharge injunction -- Debtor moved for sanctions against state agencies for willfully violating automatic stay and discharge injunction by issuing collection letters and suspending debtor's Florida driver's license for alleged child support arrearages -- Debtor is entitled to award of actual damages and sanctions pursuant to court's statutory and inherent powers, where debtor… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:20 pm by David Groshoff
  The author’s “realistic demand” misses the point that ending the war on drugs doesn’t even allow for Wall Street to invest in pharmaceutical companies at all; re-legalizing drugs does. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:15 am by royblack
Williams promptly called Murray back and he was told, “Get here right [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm by David Lat
We’re now in late September, so you know what that means. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:00 pm by David Lat
If you’re inclined towards formality, you can call it the “tax offset for domestic partner health benefits. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:41 am by Venkat
Venkat starts us off:] In re Robert Edward Forchion, Jr., 2011 WL 3834929 (Ca. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
See Callen v Callen, 287 AD2d 818 ( 3rd Dept 2001); In Re Rhianna R., 256 AD2d 1184 (4th Dept 1998) (citing Matter of Cary)(Mahady) v Megrell, 219 AD2d 334 (3rd Dept 1996), Iv App Dismissed, 88 NY2d 1065 1996); Dunbar v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am by Schachtman
  Merrell challenged Swan’s unpublished, non-peer-reviewed re-analyses as not “generally accepted” under the Frye test. [read post]