Search for: "In Re National Railroad Passenger Corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2023, 7:45 am
But CTA is exempt from installing PTC “because the CTA isn’t linked to the national rail network, and doesn’t fall under federal railroad regulations. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
Today, the Fifth Circuit will be hearing oral arguments in National Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:30 am
Specifically, it covers freight and commuter railroads, airlines, companies directly or indirectly controlled by carriers who perform services related to the transportation of freight or passengers, and the employees of these railroads, airlines, and companies. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:30 am
Specifically, it covers freight and commuter railroads, airlines, companies directly or indirectly controlled by carriers who perform services related to the transportation of freight or passengers, and the employees of these railroads, airlines, and companies. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 2:00 am
[6] Charles Francis Adams, Jr., The Government and the Railroad Corporations, 112 N. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
He was prescient in recognizing the need for a strong national government to deal with urgent issues, such as civil rights. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
In the Courts (6 cases) FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT EXEMPTION FOR INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION WORKERS TO BE VIEWED ON A NATIONAL NOT LOCAL BASIS. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:57 am
Like all Burisma directors, Hunter was compensated for his board service.Hunter focused his work on the principles of corporate transparency, governance and responsibility, which was based on his prior experience as a lawyer and director on other boards, including the Chair of World Food Program USA, which supports the largest humanitarian organization in the world, Vice-Chair of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), to which he was… [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
American Banana was an Alabama corporation organized in 1904; United Fruit was a New Jersey corporation which had been organized five years earlier. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
American Banana was an Alabama corporation organized in 1904; United Fruit was a New Jersey corporation which had been organized five years earlier. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
American Banana was an Alabama corporation organized in 1904; United Fruit was a New Jersey corporation which had been organized five years earlier. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Lawyers offered whatever support they could to arriving passengers. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 9:48 am
For private corporations, as opposed to government-mandated corporations, they must survive or die. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 9:48 am
For private corporations, as opposed to government-mandated corporations, they must survive or die. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
In the 1990 amendment to the CAA, the agency was directed by Congress to develop National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, but it also established a “unique procedure” to determine the applicability of the HAP program to fossil-fueled power plants. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
I’ve written about the case before, in a Reason.org blog post: Amtrak, formally called the National Railroad Passenger Corporation, was created by statute in 1970. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:37 am
The National Mediation Board (“NMB”), the agency charged with administering the RLA, formulates this statutory language into the following test: When an employer is not a rail or air carrier in the transportation of freight or passengers, the NMB applies a two-part test in determining whether the employer and its employees are subject to the RLA. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Canada has an complicated relationship with American slavery, being one of the final destinations of the Underground Railroad. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, 513 U. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:23 pm
National Railroad Passenger Co Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 09a0027n.06 USA v. [read post]