Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Judges" Results 1 - 20 of 12,767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2021, 9:36 am by Howard Wasserman
The new Courts Law essay comes from guest Richard Re (Virginia), reviewing Nina Varsava, Professional Responsibility and Judicial Opinions (Hous. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:57 am
In In re: Certification of Need for Additional Judges (No. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:57 am by Jeff Kuntz
In In re: Certification of Need for Additional Judges (No. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 12:37 pm by Legal Profession Prof
A recent opinion of the South Carolina advisory Committee on Standards of Judicial Conduct OPINION NO. 14 - 2018 RE: Propriety of a circuit court judge having a personal relationship with an employee of the Solicitor’s office. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 7:00 am by Todd Presnell
Attorney–Client Privilege In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754 (D.C. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 7:00 am by Todd Presnell
Attorney–Client Privilege In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754 (D.C. [read post]
25 May 2008, 6:46 am
It found that elected judges wrote more opinions, while appointed judges wrote opinions of higher quality. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:08 am by Legal Profession
A recent opinion from the South Carolina Committee on Standards of Judicial Conduct: OPINION NO. 1 - 2011 RE: Propriety of a part-time judge’s participation as a “Celebrity Judge” at a fund-raiser. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 7:29 am by Legal Profession
May a judge running for re-election create a Twitter account with a privacy setting open so anyone — including lawyers — would be able to follow the account? [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm by admin
[cite] Unlawful re-entry after removal, a more serious crime, is a federal felony. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  I'm sure everyone recalls the Supreme Court's landmark opinion in this case from 2009, In re Tobacco II Cases, 46 Cal.4th 298 (2009) (discussed here). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:08 am by Legal Profession
From the South Carolina Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee: OPINION NO. 5- 2011 RE: Propriety of an attorney serving as part-time municipal court judge when attorney’s law partner serves as the city attorney. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 8:43 am by Legal Profession Prof
A recent opinion from the South Carolina Advisory Committee on Standards of Judicial Conduct OPINION NO. 4 - 2018 RE: Propriety of a full-time magistrate judge working part-time as an independent sales representative for a travel club. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:12 pm
The thing about people like Chief Judge Kozinski is that they're so smart, and subtle, that it's sometimes hard to figure out if they're being deliberately sly or merely stumbling into saying something that may have a broader ramifications than they intended.So take this opinion, for example. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 7:37 pm by Ruthann Robson
In a 15 page opinion (with extensive appendices) issue late Wednesday, In re Reassignment of Cases: Ligon; Floyd et al. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 5:24 pm by Legal Profession Prof
A new opinion from the South Carolina Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee OPINION NO. 12 - 2018 RE: Propriety of a full-time municipal judge allowing the judge’s residence to be featured in a tour of homes. [read post]
24 May 2018, 8:11 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Above the Law – You’re Bad at Legal Research, and Your Judge Knows It: “One reason artificial intelligence is a hot topic in law: When attorneys miss precedents, the stakes are high. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 12:18 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The majority opinion in this re-exam case by Judge Prost is relatively short. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 10:27 am by Milena Sterio
First, it is important to note that the court’s decision was virtually unanimous: the judges unanimously determined that the court had jurisdiction; by twelve votes to two, the judges decided to comply with the request to render the advisory opinion (Judges Tomka and Donoghue against); by thirteen votes to one, the judges reached their substantive conclusions (Judge Donoghue against). [read post]