Search for: "In Re Phenylpropanolamine (Ppa) Products"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2006, 6:00 am
In In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, ___ F.3d ___ (Aug. 29, 2006), the Ninth Circuit addressed multidistrict litigation ("MDL") proceedings under 28 U.S.C. section 1407. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The FDA deferred action on a final monograph for PPA, and product marketing continued. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
” In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Prods. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Ohio 2009) warranty; privityIn re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, 649 F. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 2:18 am
We're big fans of the preemption defense in prescription drug cases. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 12:00 pm
Jude Medical, Inc., Silzone Heart Valves Products Liability LitigationMDL-1401 IN RE Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc., Hip Prosthesis and Knee Prosthesis Products Liability LitigationMDL-1407 IN RE Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability LitigationMDL-1431 IN RE Baycol Products Liability LitigationMDL-1477 IN RE Serzone Products Liability LitigationMDL-1481 IN RE Meridia Products… [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 3:45 am
Mar. 18, 2002) and In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1407, Case Management Order No. 6 (W.D. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 5:06 am
” Something akin to hacking the A cell occurred in the large epidemiologic study, known as “Yale Hemorrhagic Stroke Project (HSP),” which was the center piece of the plaintiffs’ case in In re Phenylpropanolamine Products Liability Litigation. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 1:06 pm
” Something akin to hacking the A cell occurred in the large epidemiologic study, known as “Yale Hemorrhagic Stroke Project (HSP),” which was the center piece of the plaintiffs’ case in In re Phenylpropanolamine Products Liability Litigation. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
See, e.g., In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Prods. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Kan. 1996).In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation, 168 F.R.D. 577 (E.D. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
Citing the court's decision in In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 214 F.R.D. 614 (W.D. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:15 am
La. 2006)(citing In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Prods. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
Id. citing In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Prods. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
See In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Prods. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:29 pm
” In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 289 F.Supp.2d 1230 (W.D.Wash.,2003)(citing Daubert v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
“[T]he reason that manufacturers are under a duty to test their products is to discover defects or dangers associated with use of the products. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Merrell challenged Swan’s unpublished, non-peer-reviewed re-analyses as not “generally accepted” under the Frye test. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
Despite the confusing verbiage, these judicial rulings are a serious deviation from the text of Rule 702, as well as the Advisory Committee Note to the 2000 Amendments, which embraced the standard articulated in In re Paoli, that “any step that renders the analysis unreliable . . . renders the expert’s testimony inadmissible. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
In scientific publishing, when scientists make a mistake, they publish an erratum or a corrigendum. [read post]
