Search for: "In Re Pillo" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2010, 8:37 am by PaulKostro
DeCola, 33 N.J. 335, 350 (1960); In re Pillo, 11 N.J. 8, 19 (1952) (stating, “The trial judge is not to accept the witness’s mere statement that the answer will tend to incriminate him. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 4:26 am
SCHOLL'S" and "AIR-PILLO" in CombinationSection 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness: Precedential No. 58: TTAB Affirms Disclaimer Requirement of "TOGGS" and 2(d) Refusal of "ZOGGS TOGGS" over "TOG & Design" for Swimsuits TTAB Deems "iPOSTAGE" Merely Descriptive of Internet Postage TTAB Reverses 2(e)(1) Descriptiveness Refusal of "FOLDOVER" for Web-Based Marketing Software TTAB Affirms 2(e)(1) Descriptiveness Refusal of… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 10:21 am
SCHOLL'S" and "AIR-PILLO" in Combination Precedential No. 36: TTAB Finds Paper Towel Designs Confusingly Similar, Sustains 2(d) Opposition Precedential No. 34: Section 2(d) Opposer Fails to Prove Priority as TTAB Rejects Analogous Use Argument Precedential No. 31: TTAB Finds "RATED R SPORTSWEAR" Confusingly Similar to the Famous "RATED R" Movie Certification Mark Precedential No. 29: TTAB Finds "ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY" Logo… [read post]