Search for: "In Re Rebecca B."
Results 1 - 20
of 306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2016, 2:42 am
In her forthcoming article, The First Amendment Walks into a Bar: Trademark Registration and Free Speech, Notre Dame Law Review (download from her 43(B)log here), Professor Rebecca Tushnet argues that the CAFC got it wrong in In re Tam [THE SLANTS]. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:17 am
In her spare time, she publishes "Rebecca Tushnet's 43(b)log. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 7:34 am
Rebecca Tushnet raises this question in her 43(b)log related to the latest Star Trek movie. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 3:16 am
The uniformly wonderful Georgetown Law prof, Rebecca Tushnet, notes in her 43(b)log a recent opinion of the South Carolina Ethics Bar that is somewhat dismissive of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 5:45 pm
Contents include:Special Issue: Populist Challenges to Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives Rebecca Sanders & Laura Dudley Jenkins, Special issue introduction: Contemporary international anti-feminism Jelena Cupać & Irem Ebetürk, Competitive mimicry: The socialization of antifeminist NGOs into the United Nations Rebecca Sanders & Laura Dudley Jenkins, Control, alt, delete: Patriarchal populist attacks on international women’s rights Gunnar… [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:40 pm
B's sister had read it in a book club and wanted out opinion. [read post]
20 May 2009, 6:00 am
There has been more law blog coverage since yesterday, with reports on all of these blogs: California Wage Law, Blawgletter, Class Action Blawg, Point of Law Forum, The Pop Tort, Storm's California Employment Law, Class Action Defense Blog, Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log, TortsProf Blog. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
B.: The Elsevier representative thanked Rebecca for this contribution to the listserv, adding, “You’ve got the complete de-coupling of the two models in our hybrid titles spot on. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 9:59 am
For example, consider a case that Rebecca Blair and I tried a few years ago. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 1:45 pm
In re RGB, No. 28582, April 1, 2010. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:14 pm
Wal-Mart potentially looms: “But that’s not what they’re seeking, exclusively or even mainly; and indeed this isn’t a proper Rule 23(b)(2) suit. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Gross, John B. and Alice R. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 2:54 am
" Examining Attorney Rebecca A. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:41 am
Rebecca Tushnet, Georgetown, Looking at the Lanham Act: Images in Trademark and Advertising Law--GUEST BLOGGERThis is Wendy Gordon, blogging a report of Rebecca’s talk. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 2:36 pm
This time, it’s all about (our old friend) loss causation, with Judge Rebecca R. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:12 am
b. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
Sorry that we're a bit late on this one, but better later than never! [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:27 am
The Indiana state director for the anti-abortion Susan B. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 8:07 am
Author Michael B. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 6:00 am
The high court indicated resolution of the issue was a matter of statutory construction…” Read more… Author Michael B. [read post]
