Search for: "In Re SCM" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2018, 9:47 pm by Marc Benitah
In EC and certain member States – Large Civil Aircraft, the EU contended that that Article 5 of the SCM should apply only to subsidies brought into existence after 1 January 1995 (i.e. the founding of the WTO). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:28 am
Article XV of GATT 1994  makes this clinical isolation difficult and it is not obvious that the definition of a subsidy in the SCM Agreement can do the job alone . [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 7:35 pm
In sophisticated supply chain systems, used products may re-enter the supply chain at any point where residual value is recyclable. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:31 pm by WIMS
  China and all of our trading partners need to understand that we want fair trade and that we're not going to allow unfair and illegal trade practices to deny our farmers, workers and businesses of the opportunity to compete on a level playing field. . . [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:06 am by Simon Lester
The Appellate Body's answer:  The launch aid "program" is outside the terms of reference, so we we're not going to decide the substance of the issue: 780. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:26 am by Dianne Saxe
The purpose of the SCM was to help evaluate remedial options. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by Andrew Lang
And we certainly cannot reshape them by arbitrarily re-imagining some or other aspect of these institutional conditions as a ‘subsidy’. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:36 am by Simon Lester
What we’ve said to them is you need to let your currency rise in accordance to the fact that your economy is rising, you're getting wealthier, you’re exporting a lot. [read post]
17 May 2018, 7:06 am by Simon Lester
In this regard, I consider that the Panel did not properly engage with the European Union's argument that the expired measure at issue could not be easily re-imposed. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:15 am
In sum, based on all of the above, we consider that the Panel erred in its interpretation of Article 19.3 of the SCM Agreement and failed to give meaning and effect to all the terms of that provision. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
acak görevli mahkeme ASCM mi yoksa SCM mi dir? [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 9:53 am by Marc Benitah
It  doesn't say  whether  you 're going  to adopt  the  incorporation  doctrine, whether you  believe in substantive due process. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:41 am by Jillian C. York
York, Director for International Freedom of Expression, Electronic Frontier Foundation Daniel Gorman, Director, English PEN Wadih Al Asmar, President, EuroMed Rights James Lynch, Co-Director, FairSquare Ruth Kronenburg, Executive Director, Free Press Unlimited Khalid Ibrahim, Executive Director, Gulf Centre for Human Rights (GCHR) Adam Coogle, Deputy Middle East Director, Human Rights Watch Mostafa Fouad, Head of Programs, HuMENA for Human Rights and Civic Engagement Sarah Sheykhali, Executive… [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 6:18 am by Simon Lester
Clearly, there are provisions that could be invoked -- GATT Article XV:4, the SCM Agreement and the non-violation provisions have all been discussed at great length as possible options -- so in that sense Huntsman is wrong. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 11:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  You’re doing this 8 hours a week (oh, if only!) [read post]