Search for: "In Re Schreiber"
Results 21 - 40
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2015, 6:29 am
Sam Brownback contacted Mark Schreiber, a government affairs vice president at Westar Energy, seeking help retiring debt left over from the governor’s re-election campaign last year. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:04 pm
The Board cited In re Geisler, 116 F.3d 1465, 1471 (Fed. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:18 pm
The Board cited In re Geisler, 116 F.3d 1465, 1471 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 8:38 am
”); In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:04 am
”); In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477 (Fed. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
“They’re just counting on you to pay the ticket anyway. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:51 am
Case No. 2: In re Joshua L., B245686; 248397 (Cal. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 8:33 am
., In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477-78 (Fed. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 11:24 am
Case citation: In re Kaleb K., 2013 WL 6182562 (Wis. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:53 pm
In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477-78 (Fed. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
Schreiber Court Upholds Student Suspension For YouTube Video of Teacher Teenager Busted for Creating Fake “News” Story [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:02 am
See In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1478 (Fed. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:53 pm
The number of applications received may include re-filings by applicants whose cases were initially rejected at the Lockbox. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 4:15 am
Cir. 2004); In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1479 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:20 am
., In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477-78 (Fed. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 10:27 am
See In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477(Fed. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:53 am
In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477 (Fed.Cir. 1997) (citations omitted).As to using the text "at least the same reasons":With respect to independent claim 9, Appellants argue claim 9 isallowable “for at least the same reasons provided above in support of thepatentability of claim 1” (App. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:46 am
The Board affirmed the examiner in Ex parte STAVENJORDAs to apparatus claims:Claims directed to an apparatus must bedistinguished from the prior art in terms of structure rather than function.See In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477-78 (Fed. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 4:02 am
However, we were not able to re-contact the participants. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
Ellen Schreiber, M. [read post]