Search for: "In Re Standard Composition Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2007, 10:39 pm
Hughes Aircraft Co., Inc. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:58 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 9:00 pm
In the instant case, as in Knight Textile, the house mark is deemed to be the primary and most distinctive element of the composite mark. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:13 am
" Citing In re Becton, Dickinson and Co.. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:23 am
Coleman Co., 93 USPQ2d 3019 (TTAB 2010) (ELECTRIC CANDLE COMPANY generic for light bulbs). [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 2:32 pm
Chemours Co. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:58 am
In a 36-page opinion, the Board sustained a Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark HONEY PIG, in standard character form, for restaurant services in view of opposer's prior use of the logo mark shown immediately below, for the same services. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 7:33 pm
If such a standard is good enough for Buddhists, then why not for prudes? [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:33 am
Co., 980 F.3d 865, 870 (Fed. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:30 pm
The applicant’s goods included orthotics, yoga mats, and rubber flooring while the Registrant owned four marks, two for BAREFOOT in standard characters, and two for BAREFOOT Composite marks for orthotics, for rubber floor mats, and yoga accessories including yoga exercise mats. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm
” Atlas Powder Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
Res. 37 that would disapprove the Environmental Protection Agency's recently issued Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) for coal-fueled power plants (also known as Utility MACT). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 10:27 am
Edison Co. of N.Y. v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 3:57 am
Co., 954 F.2d 1574, 22 USPQ2d 1190, 1197 (Fed. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 6:56 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
That’s a demanding standard. [read post]
28 May 2009, 5:48 pm
Andrew Schneider over at www.andrewschneiderinvestigates.com allowed me to co-post this great story. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 7:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:27 am
KSR International Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:53 am
“They’re here protecting his legacy. [read post]
