Search for: "In Re Subpoena to Nixon" Results 1 - 20 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2019, 9:44 am by Steve Vladeck
Nixon for the claim that “such a subpoena is permissible only where there is a ‘demonstrated, specific need’ for the information sought. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:57 am by Susan Brenner
 Additionally, the Court found Ocasio's request met the other requirements of Nixon and therefore was within the scope of Rule 17. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am by Steve Vladeck
Two especially instructive decisions are the 1997 decision in In re Sealed Case (known to posterity as the Espy ruling); and the 2004 ruling in Judicial Watch v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:51 am by Jeremy Gordon
Nixon and In re Sealed Case to support its contention that the attorney general has statutory authority to appoint the special counsel. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Hypothetical questions may seem pointless when you're at the podium, but they do give the Court a flavor about the consequences of your legal position. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 9:11 am by Stephen Bates
  Cox to Bazelon Re GJ (PDF) Cox to Bazelon Re GJ (Text) [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
Specifically, the Nixon and Clinton resolutions allowed subpoenas to be issued by the chairman and the ranking minority member “acting jointly. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
” The lawyer representing the Department of Justice eventually responded, “Not to my knowledge”—and then noted that he thought “the President would say, never before has Congress engaged in the sort of illegitimate things they’re doing. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 4:40 am
He got his start in big-time politics as a college student on Nixon’s Committee to Re-elect the President, and he publicly embraces his image as a dirty trickster, including cooperating with a 2008 New Yorker profile by Jeffrey Toobin titled, “the Dirty Trickster. [read post]
They relied heavily on prior decisions that presidents are not immune from legal process—stretching back to the enforcement of a subpoena for President Jefferson’s documents in the treason trial of Aaron Burr, and including the decisions in the Nixon tapes case and the civil lawsuit that Paula Jones brought against President Clinton. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:49 pm by Todd Presnell
The Nixon Case A federal grand jury investigating the break-in at the Watergate complex issued a subpoena to President Nixon seeking nine audiotapes. [read post]