Search for: "In Re Subpoena to Nixon"
Results 1 - 20
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2019, 9:44 am
Nixon for the claim that “such a subpoena is permissible only where there is a ‘demonstrated, specific need’ for the information sought. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:57 am
Additionally, the Court found Ocasio's request met the other requirements of Nixon and therefore was within the scope of Rule 17. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am
Two especially instructive decisions are the 1997 decision in In re Sealed Case (known to posterity as the Espy ruling); and the 2004 ruling in Judicial Watch v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 10:34 am
Nixon’s appointments voted against him in United States vs. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:34 am
Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
Nixon, 418 U. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am
Nixon, 1974). [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:35 am
Hypothetical questions may seem pointless when you're at the podium, but they do give the Court a flavor about the consequences of your legal position. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 4:35 am
They said: "We know what you're about. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:27 am
Nixon. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 12:18 pm
They relied heavily on prior decisions that presidents are not immune from legal process—stretching back to the enforcement of a subpoena for President Jefferson’s documents in the treason trial of Aaron Burr, and including the decisions in the Nixon tapes case and the civil lawsuit that Paula Jones brought against President Clinton. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:49 pm
The Nixon Case A federal grand jury investigating the break-in at the Watergate complex issued a subpoena to President Nixon seeking nine audiotapes. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:49 pm
The Nixon Case A federal grand jury investigating the break-in at the Watergate complex issued a subpoena to President Nixon seeking nine audiotapes. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
Cox secured a grand jury subpoena requiring the President to produce even more of the tapes. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
August 9 The Senate Committee takes legal action against Nixon for failure to comply with the subpoena. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:24 am
Why not issue subpoenas to get key witnesses to testify? [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
The House counters that they’re misreading those statutes and that therefore there aren’t any appropriated funds for major parts of the project.In both cases, the Executive branch is arguing that the House (or its Committee) lacks Article III standing to sue. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 2:02 pm
A better idea might be a special prosecutor -- an idea now being bruited -- with all necessary investigative, subpoena and other powers and with unlimited time and money to do the job.A third possibility is to turn over these people to an international tribunal of one kind or another. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 12:58 pm
He's also currently under subpoena, possibly facing jail time, because of his reporting. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 8:51 am
He said the Nixon precedent does not apply because challenges to the congressional subpoenas of officials in the Nixon administration were litigated in the courts, whereas the subpoenas of Trump administration officials were dealt with by the legislature. [read post]
