Search for: "In Re Subpoena to Nixon"
Results 1 - 20
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
Still, he has not ruled out the possibility should he win re-election. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
But they’re wrong for very different reasons. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 8:04 am
Nixon]” People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
That said, once the documentary evidence is in the trial record, it is ordinary accessible to the general public without any particularized showing of need, Nixon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
” In re Franklin Nat. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:00 pm
Editor’s Note: The following article should be read in conversation with “Is the Justice Department Meeting the Moment? [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:13 am
Last month, federal prosecutors reportedly sent grand jury subpoenas to potential witnesses seeking their communications with “any member, employee or agent of Donald J. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
The press is aware of no witnesses or documents that have been subpoenaed nor of any search warrants that have been executed. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am
The post-Nixon era is a useful comparison. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
Taylor Budowich, a Trump spokesman suing to block a subpoena for bank records, argued that “[t]he Select Committee has failed to identify any legislative purpose served by its Subpoena. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm
Nixon—courts are to weigh competing constitutional interests. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Now They’re Running for Office. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 5:54 pm
Why would Nixon go to court? [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
Garland additionally said he would “expect to re-up” those guidelines, though he shares our understanding that they weren’t rescinded or amended by the Trump Justice Department. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am
Nixon). [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
First, she considers Mazars, which involved the House Committees' subpoenas. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 12:18 pm
They relied heavily on prior decisions that presidents are not immune from legal process—stretching back to the enforcement of a subpoena for President Jefferson’s documents in the treason trial of Aaron Burr, and including the decisions in the Nixon tapes case and the civil lawsuit that Paula Jones brought against President Clinton. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
The House counters that they’re misreading those statutes and that therefore there aren’t any appropriated funds for major parts of the project.In both cases, the Executive branch is arguing that the House (or its Committee) lacks Article III standing to sue. [read post]
