Search for: "In Re TTB"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2012, 5:55 am
With the FDA you’re with 25 or 30 other industries. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
Some labeling changes do not require the client to re-apply for TTB approval, but it is important to know what those are and what implications any such changes may have on approval. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
If you’re uncertain if your paper application has been transferred to TTB’s online system, it is best to give NRC a call. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:58 am
Therefore, because of the potential effect on label holders if TTB were to adopt the proposed modification of the Columbia Valley AVA boundary, TTB has determined that it would be appropriate in this instance to re-open the comment period, for the specific purpose of obtaining further public comment on the proposed boundary modification, before taking any further regulatory action on this matter. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:55 am
TTB approved the label in 2008 and again in March of 2010. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:25 am
… We’re also going to talk about the extensive testing that Omission beers go through to ensure that every batch of Omission beer is well below the international gluten-free standard of 20 ppm. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 5:55 am
It takes even longer in the event TTB rejects a label and it must be corrected and resubmitted to re-start the COLA process. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 12:09 pm
The FAQ explains that a FIDS is typically needed when “you’re using a compounded flavor that was purchased from a flavor manufacturer. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:55 am
(1) TTB Not OK with Vitamin Wine (3) [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 10:40 pm
TTB should keep the momentum going and finalize its rule so that consumers can have the information they need to really know what they’re drinking. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 7:21 am
And we're under some time pressure. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 4:02 am
TTB approves Palcohol. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:46 am
In re Night Wines, LLC, Serial No. 87084959 (June 20, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
29 May 2009, 5:55 am
Under this 2008 TTB Ruling it is unlikely TTB would re-approve the product, and this may explain why the current status of this label is “surrendered. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 6:43 am
Importantly, the Sixth Circuit noted that other TTB regulations contain explicit intent-based exceptions. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 12:00 am
The upshot of all this is that producing a hard seltzer with either type of base requires a Brewer’s Notice, and – if you’re adding flavor or color – TTB formula approval. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 8:36 am
The number isn’t part of the name; BT’s own website used “Old Charter,” as did BT’s application for the label with the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:55 am
… We are now re-submitting the product with a fanciful name and not calling the product beer schnapps at all. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
But if it goes past a couple of weeks without new and replacement label approvals on the public database, it is a strong sign that it may be tough for Palcohol to re-acquire label approvals. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
But if it goes past a couple of weeks without new and replacement label approvals on the public database, it is a strong sign that it may be tough for Palcohol to re-acquire label approvals. [read post]
