Search for: "In Re V" Results 1 - 20 of 61,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2010, 2:09 am by sally
In re Perrins, deceased; Perrins v Holland and others [2010] EWCA Civ 840; [2010] WLR (D) 196 “In a case where a testator had testamentary capacity when he gave instructions for his will, the will as drafted embodied those instructions and when the testator executed his will a year later his testamentary wishes remained unchanged although he was no longer of full testamentary capacity, the principle in Parker v Felgate (1883) LR 8 PD 171, namely that it was not… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 3:46 am by traceydennis
In re Perrins, deceased; Perrins v Holland and others [2010] EWCA Civ 840; [2010] WLR (D) 196  ”In a case where a testator had testamentary capacity when he gave instructions for his will, the will as drafted embodied those instructions and when the testator executed his will a year later his testamentary wishes remained unchanged although he was no longer of full testamentary capacity, the principle in Parker v Felgate (1883) LR 8 PD 171, namely that it was not… [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Oklahoma Supplemental Brief re Bay Mills Tribal Supplemental Brief re Bay Mills The Tenth Circuit previously abated this matter pending the outcome in Michigan v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:25 am
The White Cliffs of Dover Author Walter Mittelholzer 1894-1937 Jane Lambert Trade Marks Registry (Ms A Skilton) Re VERA LYNN, Lynn v Halewood International Brands Ltd, BL O/766/19 12 Dec 2019 Dame Vera Lynn was born in 1917 and is still going strong. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:19 pm by Bankruptcy Prof
From: Bankruptcy law discussion list [mailto:BANKR-L@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU] On Behalf Of Alan Wenokur Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 5:04 PM To: BANKR-L@LISTSERV.ILLINOIS.EDU Subject: request for amicus briefs in 9th circuit re Stern v Marshall The 9th Circuit has asked for amicus briefs... [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:16 am
In re Overnight Ltd Goldfarb v Higgins and Another Chancery Division “The cause of action for fraudulent trading under section 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986 accrued on the making of the winding-up order. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:07 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
This opinion will not be published. 2009AP1547 In re the marriage of: Miheve v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:06 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
This opinion will not be published. 2009AP1846 In re the marriage of: Smith v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 9:40 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
This opinion will not be published. 2010AP392 In re the marriage of: Stumpner v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:09 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
This opinion will not be published. 2009AP1544 In re the marriage of: LeDuc v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:30 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
This opinion will not be published. 2010AP10 In re the marriage of: Baldocchi v. [...] [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:22 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
This opinion will not be published. 2009AP2837-FT In re the marriage of: Mastrodonato v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 4:21 am
In a rather significant development in the TTAB's fraud jurisprudence, the Board has re-designated as precedential its decision in Zanella Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:30 pm by essex county criminal lawyer
In Maryland v Shatzer, the US Supreme Court set a bright-line rule regarding the time period that must elapse before the police may re-question a suspect who has previously invoked Miranda. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:13 am by pierre.lesage
v=J5gCeWEGiQI De : teknoids-bounces@ruckus.law.cornell.edu [mailto:teknoids-bounces@ruckus.law.cornell.edu] De la part de Jewell, Michael Envoyé : 12 octobre 2011 12:34 À : Teknoids Objet : [teknoids] RE: Feels like a Friday to me Better… http://www.youtube.com/user/wdwstuff#p/a/f/0/we-AqDtlsEc From: teknoids-bounces@ruckus.law.cornell.edu [mailto:teknoids-bounces@ruckus.law.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of Sparks, Michael Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 11:39 AM… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:07 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
This opinion will not be published. 2009AP2564 In re the marriage of: Ar-Rahmaan v. [read post]