Search for: "In Re V" Results 21 - 40 of 62,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2009, 3:37 am
Rottmann v Brittain; In re Rottmann (a bankrupt); [2009] WLR (D) 101 “The court had power to suspend the public examination of a bankrupt pursuant to s 290 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and order the examination to be conducted in private where foreign criminal proceedings had been instituted against the bankrupt. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:30 pm by essex county criminal lawyer
In Maryland v Shatzer, the US Supreme Court set a bright-line rule regarding the time period that must elapse before the police may re-question a suspect who has previously invoked Miranda. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:13 am by pierre.lesage
v=J5gCeWEGiQI De : teknoids-bounces@ruckus.law.cornell.edu [mailto:teknoids-bounces@ruckus.law.cornell.edu] De la part de Jewell, Michael Envoyé : 12 octobre 2011 12:34 À : Teknoids Objet : [teknoids] RE: Feels like a Friday to me Better… http://www.youtube.com/user/wdwstuff#p/a/f/0/we-AqDtlsEc From: teknoids-bounces@ruckus.law.cornell.edu [mailto:teknoids-bounces@ruckus.law.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of Sparks, Michael Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 11:39 AM… [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am by Andrew Hamm
The post Women behind the bar (and the bench): Ginsburg presides over re-enactment of Goesaert v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:29 am by sally
In re Asegaai Consultants Ltd and other companies; Wood and another v Mistry [2012] EWHC 1899 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 198 “The court would not exercise its discretion under section 4(1)(b) of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 to make a disqualification order against a liquidator who had been guilty of any fraud in relation to the company or of any breach of his duty as such liquidator unless serious misconduct had been established. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 3:00 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Judicial estoppel is invoked in the Kilopass re-examinationThe requester cited to Minnesota Mining v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 11:45 am by Marty Schwimmer
Levis sues Quiksilver re fabric tabs on back pockets of jeans. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:06 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Note that the Wyeth decision of the CAFC on June 26, 2013 cites to In re Vaeck, which deals with cyanobacteria:Finally, in In re Vaeck, weaffirmed the PTO’s nonenablement rejection of claimsreciting heterologous gene expression in as many as 150genera of cyanobacteria. 947 F.2d 488, 495–96 (Fed. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 9:44 pm
McDonald containing a comment about the re-examination of the Berkeley/Eolas patent:For example, the $521 million jury verdict in the Eolas Technologies v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:30 am by Ted Frank
On Tuesday, the First Circuit issued a landmark decision on cy pres, In re Lupron Marketing. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 10:42 am
In re Hemming (deceased); Raymond Saul & Co (a Firm) v Holden and Another Chancery Division “Where a sole residuary legatee under a will became bankrupt but was automatically discharged from bankruptcy before the completion of the administration of the estate of the testator, the money and assets which were thereafter ascertained to form the net [...] [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 2:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
Derek Whayman recently published an article entitled, Landmark Cases in Tracing: Re Tilley's Will Trusts (1967) and Turner v Jacob (2006), Wills, Trusts, & Estates Law ejournal (2021). [read post]