Search for: "In Re V" Results 61 - 80 of 62,537
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2012, 5:01 am by Victoria VanBuren
Feb. 1, 2012): Does the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 8:25 am
This is the 2008 opinion by Alex Kozinski that the chapter 13 plan is res judicata even when setting forth rights typically determined by adversary proceeding. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:18 am by traceydennis
Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Holland and another In re Paycheck Services 3 Ltd and others [2010] UKSC 51; [2010] WLR (D) 298 “A director of a corporate director of a company was not a de facto director of that company, who was thereby liable for the misuse of its assets, if his acts were done entirely within the ambit of the discharge of his duties and responsibilities as a director of the corporate director. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:48 am by sally
HR Trustees Ltd v German and another; In re IMG Pension Plan [2010] EWCA Civ 1349; [2010] WLR (D) 307 “Section 91 of the Pensions Act 1995 as amended prevented neither the parties from making nor the court from approving or enforcing a bona fide compromise of any disputed or doubted right and entitlement of members of the scheme under an occupational pension scheme. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 2:31 am
Gemma Ltd (in liquidation) v Davies and another; In re Gemma Ltd (in liquidation); [2008] EWHC 546 (Ch); [2008] WLR (D) 89 “In order to establish that a person was a de facto director of a company it was necessary, inter alia, to plead and prove that he undertook functions in relation to the company which could properly be discharged only by a director. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:05 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ordered [order, DOC] re-argument in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 8:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: In re Gabriel Galanda v Nooksack Tribal Court Third Declaration of Gabriel S Galanda in Support of Appellate Writ Petitions In re Gabriel Galanda v Nooksack Tribal Court Response re Order to Show Cause and Request for Writ of Prohibition [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:57 am
In re Hemming, decd; Raymond Saul & Co (a firm) v Holden and another [2008] EWHC 2731 (Ch); [2008] WLR (D) 354 “Where a sole residuary legatee under a will became bankrupt but was automatically discharged from bankruptcy before the completion of the administration of the estate of the testator, the money and assets which were thereafter ascertained to form the net residuary estate were payable to his trustee in bankruptcy. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 10:22 am by Mortimer, Matt
The A/V Component of the I.T. department manages the YouTube channel directly. read more [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:39 am by Nicole Bürli
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Palais Wilson, Geneva Earlier this year, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (Committee) handed down a case on violence against women in the matter of T.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Lomeli v Kelly COA Opening Brief re Contempt of Court Lomeli v Kelly COA Contempt Response Brief of Appellees Lomeli v Kelly COA Contempt Reply Brief re Contempt of Court Lomeli v Kelly COA Opinion re Contempt Lower court order here. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:45 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The recent decision of the British Columbia Supreme Court in Boxer Capital Corp. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:14 am by sally
In re Employers’ Liability “Trigger” Litigation; Durham v BAI (Run-off) Ltd; Freming & Eddlestone v Independent Insurance Co Ltd; Edwards v Excess Insurance Co Ltd; Thomas Bates & Son Ltd v BAI (Run-off) Ltd; Akzo; Nobel UK Ltd and another v Excess Insurance Co Ltd; Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Co and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1096; [2010] WLR (D) 256 “In any year in which an employee… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:03 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
As the writer of the amicus brief on behalf of the Pennsylvania Defense Institute in favor of the defense position, I just received notification from the Pennsylvania Superior Court that the Re-Argument en banc in the case of Barrick v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 5:36 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: galanda-broadman-response-re-nooksack-supreme-court in-re-gabriel-galanda-v-nooksack-tribal-court-tribal-court-of-appeals-motion-for-show-cause-order-re-contempt in-re-gabriel-galanda-v-nooksack-tribal-court-whatcom-county-superior-court-petition-for-entry-of-foreign-judgment rabang-v-romero-tribal-court-complaint [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Examples include the dispute between the CCPA (particularly Judge Rich) and the Office in the In re Bergy / In re Chakrabarty cases (dealing with the patent-eligibility of living things), only finally resolved by the Supreme Court's decision contrary to the Office's position in Diamond v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Applying the doctrine of res judicata  Bayer v City of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 02005, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentWhen the employee [Plaintiff] filed a lawsuit alleging that he had been the victim of unlawful discrimination, Supreme Court dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.* The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling.Plaintiff was served with disciplinary pursuant to Civil… [read post]