Search for: "In Re WH" Results 1 - 20 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2022, 4:00 pm by Mary Chastain
CNBC host to Jared Bernstein: "I’m talking about, if you’re doubling the size of the IRS, then who are they going to go after? [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:14 pm by Quinta Jurecic
  2019 10 04 EEC Engel Schiff to Mulvaney WH Re Subpoena (PDF)2019 10 04 EEC Engel Schiff to Mulvaney WH Re Subpoena (Text)   2019 10 02 COR WH Subpoena Memo and Schedule (PDF)2019 10 02 COR WH Subpoena Memo and Schedule (Text)   2019 09 24 Eec Engel Schiff to Cipollone Wh Re Potus Ukraine (PDF)2019 09 24 Eec Engel Schiff to Cipollone Wh Re Potus Ukraine (Text)   Ele Schiff Cummings Letter… [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 12:11 pm by Matthew Kahn
  Cummings Request   2019 03 01 EEC to Cipollone WH Re Security Clearances (PDF) 2019 03 01 EEC to Cipollone WH Re Security Clearances (Text) Cipollone Response     2019 03 04 2 Cipollone to EEC Re Security Clearances (PDF) 2019 03 04 2 Cipollone to EEC Re Security Clearances (Text) [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:56 am by Mikhaila Fogel
  Memorandum from Committee Staff Regarding Tricia Newbold Interview   Newbold Security Clearances (PDF)Newbold Security Clearances (Text) Letter from Chairman Cummings to White House Counsel   2019 04 01 Cummings Ltr Cipollone WH Re Security Clearances 1 (PDF)2019 04 01 Cummings Ltr Cipollone WH Re Security Clearances 1 (Text) [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 7:37 am by Ximena Marinero
[JURIST] US President Barack Obama effectively issued his first veto [WH memorandum of disapproval] of congressional legislation Wednesday, rejecting as "unnecessary legislation" a stopgap spending bill [HJ Res 64 text, PDF] that was drafted in case inclement weather would have interfered with the vote that approved the appropriations for the Department of Defense (DOD) [official website] two [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 5:02 pm
Confirming Rahmbo, via think Progress, WH Press Secretary Robert Gibbs say no to torture prosecutions: CNN’S ED HENRY: Just so I understand, you’re saying the people in the CIA who followed through on what they were told was legal, they should not be prosecuted? [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 7:59 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“If you’re reading this, we need your help building back better,” the message said. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:48 am by Kevin Schmidt
@NSArchive Director Blanton re: Mar-a-Lago logs: "I'm outraged. [read post]
If they’re going to try to branch off on their own, they’d better make sure their new operation is significantly different from their employer’s, or at least has a new approach to the industry. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 3:10 pm
UPDATE: Reader Paul Harper writes on Rangel and Pajama-baiting: Interesting timing re: take off the pajamas. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 8:20 am by Ann Althouse
And they're going to expect me to campaign again too? [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 4:34 am by Andrew Frisch
 While re-affirming that non-willful waivers would be deemed null & void, the court explained that the issue would be one for the finder of fact at trial. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:00 am
Two weeks ago, when I reported on the Supreme Court's grant of review in In re Tobacco II and Pfizer, I pointed out that the two Court of Appeal opinions were "no longer citable as precedent. [read post]