Search for: "In Re the Central Railroad Company of New Jersey" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2021, 9:47 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
In rejecting the driver’s argument that the applicable “class of workers” are those drivers in and around the District of Columbia servicing other states, the court concluded that “[u]nlike seamen and railroad workers, for whom the interstate movement of goods and passengers over long distances across state lines is ‘a central part of the job description,’ Lyft drivers offer services that are primarily local and intrastate in nature. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
Jury Finds Plaintiffs Lawyers Defrauded Railroad in Asbestos Suit Corporate Counsel When a federal jury returned a verdict against two Mississippi plaintiffs lawyers, finding they had committed fraud against Illinois Central Railroad, it was the culmination of the railroad's seven-year battle against abusive asbestos claims. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The Supreme Court decided American Tobacco on the same day Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The Supreme Court decided American Tobacco on the same day Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The Supreme Court decided American Tobacco on the same day Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Canadian National Railway/Illinois Central Railroad Company, a case set to be reconsidered by the DOL. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  There’s also a “best evidence rule” argument, but we’re not quarrelling with that. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
Under the settlement, the railroad will pay a civil penalty of $3,967,500 for the alleged CWA violations, which included the discharge of tons of chlorine from a derailed train tank car and thousands of gallons of diesel fuel from ruptured locomotive engine fuel tanks. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am by Steven M. Taber
Under EPCRA regulations, companies of certain size are required to submit their annual reports to EPA and state authorities by listing the amounts of regulated chemicals that their facilities release into the environment through routine activities or as a result of accidents. [read post]