Search for: "In Re the Dow Chemical Co"
Results 1 - 20
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
Dow Chemical Co., No. 03-47775-NZ (Saginaw County, Mich., Cir. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 12:49 pm
In a joint statement issued Friday, the companies — Dow Chemical Co. and Rohm & Haas Co. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 7:38 pm
Especially if you're dealing with Chief Judge Kozinski and Judges Reinhardt, Berzon and Tashima. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 8:45 am
In Re The Dow Chemical Company Derivative Litigation, Cons. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 4:23 am
Dow Chemical Co. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 6:01 am
Dow Chemical Co. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:24 am
See Condit Chemical & Gran Co., 789 F.2d at 1102. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:04 am
The Dow Chemical Case Dow was a shareholder derivative suit filed nearly a year ago amid turmoil over Dow’s planned acquisition of another chemical company, Rohm & Haas, for aggregate consideration of approximately $18.8 billion. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm
” Dow says on its Web site that the chemical can impact the heath of laboratory animals. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:53 pm
The certified question on appeal is whether the change-of-law exception to issue preclusion applies in this case – citing primarily Dow Chemical Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:28 pm
Biltz, Vice President, Energy and Climate Change, The Dow Chemical Company. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 11:02 am
In Dow Chemical Company v Organik Kimya, Vice Chancellor Glasscock held that although Dow Chemicals had argued for long-arm jurisdiction over all the foreign defendants, it only extended to Organik Kimya Turkey (the Turkish parent of the US subsidiary). [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Similar Chemical Structures Have the Same Toxicities Gottesman asserted that human teratogenicity can be determined from similarity in chemical structures with other established teratogens.4 Close may count in horseshoes, but in chemical structural activities, small differences in chemical structures can result in huge differences in toxicologic or pharmacologic properties. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:36 am
”The leading case is Dow Chemical Co. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:48 am
See In re Dow Chemical Co., 837 F.2d 469, 473, 5 U.S.P.Q.2d 1529, 1531 (Fed.Cir.1988). [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
See Cardinal Chemical Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 2:45 pm
It’s produced by a number of large petrochemical concerns like Dow Chemical, BP, ConocoPhillips–names behind a hundred different component substances you’d probably never think twice about, but are rolled into things you use every day. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Jimenez, No. 14-910, and Dow Chemical Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:10 pm
Rohm & Haas Co., 2010 WL 935650, at *3 (Mich. [read post]
