Search for: "In Re the United Corporation" Results 21 - 40 of 8,095
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2023, 7:05 am by Todd Presnell
For the first time in some time, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear a case involving the corporate attorney–client privilege. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 7:05 am by Todd Presnell
For the first time in some time, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear a case involving the corporate attorney–client privilege. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:36 pm by Steve Bainbridge
I forced my Corporate Governance class to sit through excerpts of the execrable documentary The Corporation yesterday so that they could see for themselves the absurdity of the anti-corporation movement. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:15 am by Steve Bainbridge
" Second, Nader's suggestions for dealing with Citizens United demonstrate the incoherence of restricting corporate speech. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:55 pm by Frank Pasquale
” Written in response to the Citizens United decision, the paper makes the case for requiring shareholder approval of corporate political expenditures: Under existing corporate-law rules, corporate political speech decisions are subject to the same rules as ordinary business decisions. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:15 am by Paul Caron
Georgetown Public Policy Review: We’re Doing It Wrong – Corporate Taxation in the United States, by Alex Engler: Senator Max Baucus [D-MT] made some noise this week when he announced that he had turned his attention to an overhaul of the United States tax code. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 10:29 pm by Joe
The majority of the states in these United States have a corporate income tax which they levy on their in-state businesses. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:31 pm
Now that the conversion of IMH Secured Loan Fund units into shares of IMH Financial Corporation is complete, brokerage firms have begun quietly disseminating the bad news to their customers. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
For the first time in some time, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear a case involving the corporate attorney–client privilege. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
For the first time in some time, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear a case involving the corporate attorney–client privilege. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
For the first time in some time, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear a case involving the corporate attorney–client privilege. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
For the first time in some time, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear a case involving the corporate attorney–client privilege. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
For the first time in some time, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear a case involving the corporate attorney–client privilege. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
For the first time in some time, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear a case involving the corporate attorney–client privilege. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:45 am by Larry Ribstein
Whether or not shareholders’ protectors are seeking to restrict corporate speech, that’s what they’re likely to accomplish. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:33 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Deven Desai: Challenging corporations is difficult, necessary, and proper. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:51 am
Based on the oral argument in the Citizens United case (which I previewed here and which is summarized nicely here), it appears that the Supreme Court is likely to overrule the precedents establishing governmental authority to regulate political speech by corporations. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:28 am by Timothy P. Flynn
On September 9th, the nine Justices of the United States Supreme Court will end their summer recess early to return to Washington for a rare re-argument in what has turned out to be a momentus case: Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission.The case involves federal regulation of the political documentary titled, "Hillary, The Movie", which took a critical look at the character and career of Ms Clinton back in her pre-presidential candidate days. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:28 am by Timothy P. Flynn
On September 9th, the nine Justices of the United States Supreme Court will end their summer recess early to return to Washington for a rare re-argument in what has turned out to be a momentus case: Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission.The case involves federal regulation of the political documentary titled, "Hillary, The Movie", which took a critical look at the character and career of Ms Clinton back in her pre-presidential candidate days. [read post]