Search for: "In re: Application of the U.S. for Historical Cell Site Data" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2015, 7:22 am by Steve Kalar
" Id. at 6.San Jose Magistrate Judge Lloyd denied the application, and the government appealed as to historical cell site information only. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
The court ruled that Cell site data is a business record. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
The court ruled that Cell site data is a business record. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
’ In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data, supra. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm by Orin Kerr
Today the Fifth Circuit issued its opinion, which is available here: In Re: Application of the United States of America for Historical Cell Site Data. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:42 am by Jeff Welty
Davis, 785 F.3d 498 (11th Cir. 2015) (en banc); In re Application of U.S. for Historical Cell Site Data, 724 F.3d 600 (5th Cir. 2013), while the Third Circuit has issued a rather murky opinion more or less agreeing with that perspective but ruling nonetheless that a court may sometimes require a warrant before compelling access to CSLI, In re Application of the U.S., 620 F.3d 304 (3d Cir. 2010), and now the… [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:53 am by Jeff Welty
In re Application of the United States, 620 F.3d 304 (2010). [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:54 am by Orin Kerr
Davis, 785 F.3d 498, 511 (11th Cir. 2015) (en banc); In re Application for Historical Cell Site Data, 724, F.3d 600, 614 (5th Cir. 2013). [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:10 am by Rosemary McKenna
” (“Pings” are more formally referred to as cell-site location information or “CLSI. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:10 am by Rosemary McKenna
” (“Pings” are more formally referred to as cell-site location information or “CLSI. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
Because Davis has no reasonable expectation of privacy in the type of non-content data collected in MetroPCS’s historical cell tower records, neither [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm by Orin Kerr
Applying the Traditional Approach to Historical Cell-Site Records Applying this traditional body of law to historical cell-site records is pretty straightforward, I think. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 8:41 am
Buchanan argues the lesser standard applicable to pen registers and trap and traces, that only a showing that the data is relevant to an ongoing investigation, is necessary. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:08 am by David LaBahn
” However, the 5th Circuit stated in In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data, “[c]ell phone users, therefore, understand that their service providers record their location information when they use their phones at least to the same extent that the landline users in Smith understood that the phone company recorded the numbers they dialed. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:50 pm by Stephen Wm. Smith
E911 location information is different from cell-site data, in part because cellular-service providers typically do not collect and maintain E911 location information in the ordinary course of business. [read post]