Search for: "In re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation"
Results 1 - 20
of 206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2016, 10:46 am
Additional Resources: In re: New York City Asbestos Litig., September 15, 2016, New York Court of Appeals More Blog Entries: New Effort to Strengthen Asbestos Litigation, June 28, 2016, Boston Mesothelioma Lawyer Blog The post In re: New York City Asbestos Litigation appeared first on Mesothelioma Lawyers Blog. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:26 am
The most recent example of judicial impatience with the ploy of having an expert witness give a narrative of historical events is MDL 1909, In re Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents Products Liability Litigation, 2010 WL 1796334, *13 (N.D.Ohio May 4, 2010). [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:27 pm
See, e.g., In re Related Asbestos Cases, 543 F.Supp. 1142 (N.D. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 6:29 pm
Asbestos litigation was initiated in the 1970's for health conditions arising out of the exposure to asbestos products including asbestosis, lung cancer and mesothelioma. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
Judge Eduardo Robreno recently ruled that punitive damages were available to seamen in the consolidated asbestos products liability multidistrict litigation pending in the Eastern District or Pennsylvania. [read post]
28 May 2019, 1:02 pm
In the earplug cases, Some examples of prominent bellwether cases in recent years include product liability lawsuits against big tobacco companies and asbestos product manufacturers. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
Pa. 2012); In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
This theory of liability, not utilized in asbestos litigation, is currently being asserted in COVID claims. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:15 am
Another way to reduce litigation costs would be to have a truncated adjudication for certain product liability mass torts. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
Daubert itself was a pharmaceutical product liability case, as were Joiner and Kumho Tire. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:19 am
The amazing thing about asbestos litigation is that, much like the product that spawned it, it seems to be virtually indestructible. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 11:08 pm
Interesting new decision out of the Asbestos MDL the other day, In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:05 pm
Call: 717-671-1901 [promotion for Commonwealth Foundation, a Pennsylvania free-market-oriented outfit] How litigation finance might remake the lawsuit landscape [Nora Freeman Engstrom via TortsProf] Tweet Tags: asbestos, Japan, product liability, Stella LiebeckLiability and torts roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 6:08 pm
The case of In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 8:24 am
The “every exposure” theory in asbestos litigation has been widely criticized and many judges have concluded it doesn’t pass muster in a court of law. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
In re Darvocet, Darvon & Propoxyphene Products Liability Litigation, 2012 WL 3842045, at *7-8 (E.D. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 10:02 am
However, it’s no secret that asbestos litigation is not only extremely complex, but also chalk full of uncertainties. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
If an MDL decision was favorable to the defendant only on, say, asbestos exposure product identification (the most common example by far), we have not included it.Caveat #4. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am
See also In re Asbestos Prods. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm
June 7, 2005) – all holding that the heeding presumption is limited to strict liability and that Pennsylvania bars use of strict liability in prescription medical product litigation. [read post]
