Search for: "In re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation" Results 1 - 20 of 199
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm by admin
Asbestos litigation existed as workman’s compensation cases from the 1930s, and as occasional, isolated cases against manufacturers, from the late 1950s.[1] By 1970, federal regulation of asbestos, in both occupational and environmental settings, however, helped create a legal perpetual motion machine that is still running, half a century later. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:37 pm by Bill Henderson
Miller, Joe Kilpatrick, and Jen Dlugosz, who all specialize in toxic tort and products liability defense work, including the management of large portfolios of asbestos litigation on behalf of some of the world’s largest corporations. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:12 pm by Levin Papantonio
Tisi serves as co-chair of the Plaintiffs’ Discovery for In Re: Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, MD 2738 (D.N.J.). [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
The important divide between regulatory practice and the litigation of causal claims in civil actions arises from the theoretical nature of the risk assessment enterprise. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In Owens Corning, the court found the securities class action – which alleged the company misrepresented its exposure to asbestos claims in its financial reports – did not “arise out of” asbestos, but rather out of the directors misleading investors regarding the company’s projected financial performance. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 11:55 am by Joe Consumer
This isn’t the end of opioid litigation or settlement talks, of course. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm by admin
INTRODUCTION The new, third edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence was released to the public in September 2011, as a joint production of the National Academies of Science, and the Federal Judicial Center. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am by admin
Marmor, eds., Product Liability Litigation: Current Law, Strategies and Best Practices (2nd ed. 2021). [8] Id. at § 8:5.1 Overview (referring to In re Silica Prods. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm by admin
About the same time, many states adopted some version of strict product liability, some stricter than others. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 10:11 am by Schachtman
Ignorantia facti is not an excuse for someone who argues for a radical re-ordering of an already fragile litigation system. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 10:11 am by admin
Ignorantia facti is not an excuse for someone who argues for a radical re-ordering of an already fragile litigation system. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
The asbestos-containing product manufacturers settled or were bankrupt. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am by Schachtman
Knowledge of hazards of any product may change over time, as can the regulatory context for the use of the product. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:56 am by Schachtman
Lederle Laboratories, 97 N.J. 429, 479 A.2d 374 (1984). [13]  In re Asbestos Litigation, 628 F.Supp. 774 (D.N.J.1986) (eight to six), aff’d sub nom. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
This theory of liability, not utilized in asbestos litigation, is currently being asserted in COVID claims. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am by Schachtman
Mar. 26, 2007); In re Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 48 Misc. 3d 460, 483-484 (Sup. [read post]