Search for: "In re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation" Results 21 - 40 of 199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2018, 10:02 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
However, it’s no secret that asbestos litigation is not only extremely complex, but also chalk full of uncertainties. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 7:39 pm by Sean Wajert
See In Re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am by Sean Wajert
 E.g., TMJ Implants Products Liability Litigation, 872 F. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:16 am
But as loyal LBers know, we get a kick out of deliberately over-hyping any reported uptick in a certain type of product-liability case. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
”  The complaint alleged that, in 1978, a group of “approximately 125 plaintiffs’ asbestos contingency fee attorneys banded together to form and fund the Asbestos Litigation Group (“ALG”) in order to further their scheme of promoting asbestos litigation. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am by Schachtman
In Re Asbestos Litigation, Texas Multi District Litigation Cause No. 2004-03964 (June 30, 2005)(Davidson, J.) [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:31 am
In re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1596 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:55 am by Carrie Lin
Impact of O’Neil Decision on California Asbestos Litigation Going Forward The O’Neil decision will likely have a significant impact on asbestos litigation going forward. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
”  Kurns, 2012 WL 631857, at *4.T’ain’t no field preemption in prescription medical product liability litigation. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
The asbestos-containing product manufacturers settled or were bankrupt. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am by admin
Marmor, eds., Product Liability Litigation: Current Law, Strategies and Best Practices (2nd ed. 2021). [8] Id. at § 8:5.1 Overview (referring to In re Silica Prods. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:56 am by Schachtman
Lederle Laboratories, 97 N.J. 429, 479 A.2d 374 (1984). [13]  In re Asbestos Litigation, 628 F.Supp. 774 (D.N.J.1986) (eight to six), aff’d sub nom. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 2:35 am by Sean Wajert
If asbestos is the grandfather of mass torts, the DES litigation may be the grandmother, with claims continuing today for harm allegedly caused by in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol decades ago. [read post]