Search for: "In re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation" Results 61 - 80 of 206
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
  The legislature chose not to punish FDA-regulated activity, but the court nullified that legislative decision, with practically no discussion.In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Product Liability Litigation, 804 F.3d 633 (3d Cir. 2015). [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
  See also In re Asbestos School Litigation, 46 F.3d 1284, 1294-96 (3d Cir. 1994) (First Amendment precluded product liability action). [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:15 am
And in the case captioned In re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation -- a case in which I participated in the briefing but which my client's lead trial counsel did an excellent job of arguing on appeal -- you can access the oral argument audio via this link (11.8 MB mp3 audio file). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  In fact, product liability law often follows a “needs of the many” approach that supports research, development, and limitation of liability for prescription medical products, where large damage awards can occur in the Wink of an Eye and can result in The Doomsday Machine for such products. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
  The consolidation is an attempt at a Rule 23(c)(4) single-issue class certification without the class action – since class actions are never certified anymore in personal injury prescription medical product litigation (as demonstrated here). [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 12:56 pm
            From In re: New York City Asbestos Litig., No. 190411/13, 2015 N.Y. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Richard Epstein, Hoover “Defining Ideas”, “The Folly of ‘Fair’ Housing”] “Confusion and uncertainty” in housing sector as to what disparate impact liability actually will mean, after Supreme Court ruling [Hans Bader, CEI; earlier] And he’ll take the low road: “Donald Trump sued Scotland” [Lowering the Bar, earlier] Garlock database shows “staggering” amount of money changing hands in asbestos… [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:57 am by Emma Durand-Wood
Product injury firm Hissey Kientz shared a steady stream of news related to the drugs that have injured their clients, including Zofran,  Xarelto, and Viagra; the firm also reported on Russia and India’s plan to block the UN’s proposed ban on asbestos exports (asbestos causes a deadly form of cancer called mesothelioma). [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  A verifiable alternative cause could be a game-changer for asbestos litigation. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:01 pm by Schachtman
Fitzpatrick, “Digging Deep to Attack Bias of Plaintiff Experts,” DRI Products Liability Seminar (2013). [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am by Schachtman
Judge Johnson is not only an accomplished writer of historical fiction, but he is also an astute evaluator of the facts and data, and the accompanying lawyers’ rhetoric, thrown about in pharmaceutical products liability litigation. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
  As far as we can tell it has not yet prevailed in any product liability action. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
Pa. 2012); In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation  (No. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 Examples are not driving a riding lawnmower parallel to a slope (because you’ll tip over) or only handling asbestos while using a respirator (because breathing asbestos can do nasty things to you). [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
Her decedent had been a heavy smoker for many years, and he had been exposed minimally to asbestos in his office job on the property of an asbestos product manufacturing plant. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:27 pm by Schachtman
See, e.g., In re Related Asbestos Cases, 543 F.Supp. 1142 (N.D. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
Judge Eduardo Robreno recently ruled that punitive damages were available to seamen in the consolidated asbestos products liability multidistrict litigation pending in the Eastern District or Pennsylvania. [read post]