Search for: "In re: Auto. Antitrust Cases I and II" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2017, 11:15 am by admin
In one case alone (the ongoing auto parts investigation) the Bureau had already by the end of 2015 issued over 200 immunity and leniency markers to 21 cooperating parties. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 8:57 am by admin
There is a higher probability that the company is competing with other SOEs and private domestic and foreign firms in the Chinese and non-Chinese markets if the SOE: (i) has been commercialized and “corporatized” and is more independent from government; (ii) has both government and non-government investors and owners including retail investors and foreign firms that are equity partners; (iii) is being traded on Chinese, Hong Kong, or other stock exchanges; and (iv) has joint… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:37 pm by Matthias Weller
Lehmann presented Article 6(3) of the Rome II Regulation for antitrust matters as an example. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:25 am by Shannon O'Hare
Furthermore, do the terms of the governing credit agreement permit for the transfer of the underlying loan in the case of a change of grantor? [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
I was peppered with questions about drug use and whether I was gay. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:56 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
According to the facts published in the WHD Opinion Letter, the home health provider represented that a typical standard rate of pay is $10.00 per hour with a client including travel time,” and that “[i]f any employee works over 40 hours (total paid hours and [travel] time) in any given workweek, the employer pays the employee time and a half for all time over 40 hours at a rate of $10.00. [read post]