Search for: "In re: Cordua Restaurants, Inc."
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2016, 3:40 am
In re Cordua Restaurants, Inc., Appeal No. 2015-1432 (May 13, 2016) [precedential].The question of whether a term is generic is a question of fact. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:05 am
In re Cordua Restaurants, Inc., 2016 WL 2786364 (Fed. [read post]
14 May 2016, 6:34 am
” Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 10:57 am
See In re Cordua Restaurants, Inc. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 10:57 am
See In re Cordua Restaurants, Inc. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:29 am
" In re Cordua Rests., Inc., 823 F.3d 594, 603 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:48 am
See In re Analog Devices Inc., 6 USPQ2d 1808, 1810 (TTAB 1988), aff’d, 871 F.2d 1097, 10 USPQ2d 1879 (Fed. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:26 am
The Board shrugged that off, pointing out that each application must be examined on its own merits, and citing In re Cordua Rests., Inc., 118 USPQ2d 1632 (Fed. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 2:57 am
In re Cordua Rests., 118 USPQ2d at 1638 cited in Royal Crown v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 3:26 am
See, e.g., In re Cordua Restaurants [CHURRASCOS in stylized form found to be generic for restaurant services despite registration of the word in standard character form].Applicant contended that its Thermos-style survey evidence proved that "The Vitamin Shoppe" is a trademark, but the Board pointed out that this is not a situation where a coined term or phrase is alleged to be generic. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” The Board sustained the examiner’s determination that “churrascos” is a generic term with respect to restaurant services only after concluding that the examiner had proved this fact by clear and convincing evidence.In re Cordua Rests., Inc., 823 F.3d 594, 600-01, 118 U.S.P.Q.2d 1632, 1635 (Fed. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 10:26 am
The NLRB’s decision in Cordua Restaurants, Inc. 368 NLRB No. 43 (2019) held: Employers are not prohibited under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) from informing employees that failing or refusing to sign a mandatory arbitration agreement will result in their discharge. [read post]
