Search for: "In re: Fitness Holdings Int'l"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2013, 6:40 pm
[Inquiry 1] The first question is whether the claimed invention fits within one of the four statutory classes set out in § 101. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:40 pm
On April 30, 2013, the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals-which hears appeals of bankruptcy court decisions throughout the greater West Coast region including California-published an opinion ( In re Fitness Holdings Int'l, Inc. ) which gives me the opportunity to explain "fraudulent transfers." [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:26 pm
Common sense teaches . . . that familiar items may have obvious uses beyond their primary purposes, and in many cases a person of ordinary skill will be able to fit the teachings of multiple patents together like pieces of a puzzle.KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 1:52 pm
In its April 30, 2013 opinion in In the Matter of: Fitness Holdings Int'l, the Ninth Circuit held that recharacterization and equitable subordination address distinct concerns, and a recharacterization challenge separate from equitable subordination is permissible. [read post]
