Search for: "In re Admin. Order No. 21--Electronic Filing"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2020, 3:14 pm
Reading an assortment of files in no particular order, not being able to easily navigate backwards and forwards from one part of the bundle to another to cross check something – significantly compromises an advocates’ ability to prepare, to get a sense of the shape of the case – and leads to a need to re-read documents which didn’t make sense the first time around because they were approached without vital contextual knowledge. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
Here, the clerk transferred the case immediately after the judge ordered transfer even though the local rules call for a 21 day delay. [read post]
20 May 2022, 10:26 am
Due to “docket watching” made possible by the modern invention of electronic filing, Defendants filed for removal within 48 hours of Plaintiff filing the instant matter. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm
Due to “docket watching” made possible by the modern invention of electronic filing, Defendants filed for removal within 48 hours of Plaintiff filing the instant matter. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 7:47 am
On October 21, 2021, Prof. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:57 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Currently pending in the U.S. courts is a case[20] in which the U.S. government is relying on the SCA to compel Microsoft to produce email stored in Ireland;[21] Microsoft is resisting on the ground that the SCA cannot compel production of data stored abroad; and the Government of Ireland has filed an amicus brief asserting its sovereignty, but conceding that it is “incumbent upon Ireland to acknowledge” that its own Supreme Court has “held that . . . there… [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Various Tort Claimants Court: U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-35206 September 21, 2011 Judge: Ikuta Areas of Law: Bankruptcy, Government & Administrative Law, Injury Law This case was related to certain documents produced in discovery and filed in the bankruptcy court, containing allegations that Father M and D, two priests who were not parties to the Portland Archdiocese's bankruptcy case, had sexually abused children. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
– sound recording copyright royalties and cinematographic works (IP Osgoode) Century 21 v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 6:47 am
Cir., June 1, 2021 ) -- reversing district court’s decision and concluding that: (1) DOJ improperly segmented one large electronic file into separate records and withheld portions as non-responsive; (2) plaintiff had standing to challenge agency’s practice and policy of segmenting records, but issue was unripe for adjudication.RM: As a disclaimer, I argued this case. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
Our users include a variety of roles, from managing partners, to associate lawyers, paralegals and admin/operations team members. [read post]
