Search for: "In re Amend. to R. Governing Admission to the Bar"
Results 1 - 20
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2012, 1:52 pm
(In re Goodell, 39 Wis. 232 (1876)). [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:18 pm
R. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
” Repeat after me, Ninth Circuit: Amended Rule 702, not “Daubert,” governs the admissibility of expert testimony, and Rule 702 inaugurated the strictest admissibility standard for expert testimony ever known to American jurisprudence, and cannot by any sensible measure be deemed a “liberal” standard. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:35 pm
State Bar gave Rick something of a victory, though the release of the records is by no means guaranteed:Appellants Richard Sander, Joe Hicks and the California First Amendment Coalition seek access to admissions records from the State Bar of California (the Bar), subject to conditions designed to ensure the privacy of bar applicants, in order to conduct academic research on discrepancies in bar passage rates among racial and ethnic… [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 6:40 am
In general, an attorney is admitted to the bar of these federal courts upon payment of a fee and taking an oath of admission. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:41 am
To make lawyers aware of the new practice authority, the Commission also proposes to amend Rule 5.5(d)(2) of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct to remind lawy [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
His calls for re-examining Times v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
By: Marshall R. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Absent such a showing, the defendant fails to establish by admissible evidence that it qualifies for immunity under the Graves Amendment. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:58 am
United States, the justices explored the intricacies of the Sixth Amendment confrontation clause, evidence law, and jury instructions, as they sought to develop a workable rule governing the admission of confessions in trials with multiple defendants. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
Lynch, & R. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
” The government also emphasized the public’s reliance on the notion that affirmative action is permissible. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
” Reply of Defendant Mark R. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
Solicitor General Michael R. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:26 am
ICSOP and American Home brought an application seeking a summary dismissal of the Global Action arguing that the Court of Appeal had already determined that the limitation period applicable to Global's claim for contribution had expired and that the issue was res judicata, or governed by the principle of issue estoppel, and that the claim should be struck as an abuse of process. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:01 am
In addition, the court held that nothing in the statute governing pretrial diversion programs requires a trial court to advise a defendant of possible immigration consequences. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
Government entities are categorically barred by the First Amendment from suing for libel; it’s not just that they have to show that the speaker knew the statement was likely false (the standard for lawsuits by government officials) — they can’t sue at all. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
The bar committee was able to characterize speech as evidence of a propensity to violate the norms governing the legal profession. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
The statute’s been amended to now provide as follows: The movant may show that such reasonable basis exists, and the trustee may rebut any such showing by presenting affidavits, answers to interrogatories, admissions, depositions, and any evidence otherwise admissible under the Florida Evidence Code. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
R. [read post]
