Search for: "In re Answers Corp. Shareholders Litigation" Results 1 - 20 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
The answer derives from New York’s closely related preclusionary doctrines of claim preclusion (known as res judicata), and issue preclusion (known as collateral estoppel). [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:34 am by Peter Mahler
Potential client sits down with business divorce lawyer and says, “I’m a minority shareholder in XYZ Corp. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:40 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Majority shareholders answer that the minority shareholder was ousted due to his own misconduct, so he is a bad faith petitioner with no right to seek dissolution. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Although the market for SPAC IPOs has cooled relative to 2021, litigation arising out of SPAC transactions remains active, and courts have started to rule on motions to dismiss in SPAC-related shareholder lawsuits, with several recent decisions finding plaintiffs’ allegations to be sufficient to move forward. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:07 pm by Nate Nead
Understanding who is/was on the board, who are/were shareholders and who is/was an officer of the organization is helpful if any of the other listed items hit the fan: you’ll know who to go to directly to ask questions and get answers. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  A counterclaim for judicial  dissolution in an existing litigation won't cut it. [read post]