Search for: "In re Application to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings" Results 81 - 100 of 142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In 2014, he tweeted that “Putin has become a big hero in Russia” and added, "I believe Putin will continue to re-build the Russian Empire. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm by John Rubin
See Use of North Carolina Subpoena to Obtain Documents from Foreign Entity or Individual, 2014 Formal Ethics Opinion 7 (2014). [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:00 pm by Karel Frielink
In order to obtain a judgment which is enforceable in Curacao the claim must be re-litigated before the Curacao courts. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:17 am by Susan Hennessey, Nicholas Weaver
Fair warning: we’re going to get in the weeds on both the law and technology. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:25 am by Brenda Fulmer
  Recently, an application was filed requesting that a Judicial Council Coordinated Proceedings (“JCCP”) be established in state court for the coordination of Xarelto lawsuits in that state. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In this, there was an issue that the patent applicant had presented only arguments of counsel, with the examiner citing to In re Huang, 100 F.3d 136, 139 (CAFC 1996 ) and In re De Blauwe, 736 F.2d 699, 705 (CAFC 1984 ). [read post]
” Specifically, DMWW asserts that the doctrines set forth by the defendants are no longer applicable in light of “modern understanding. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am by Barry Sookman
He re-iterated his claims that Canadian negotiators had caved to US demands that Canada implement a US notice and takedown system.[4] He claimed the problem stemmed from a requirement in the Annex to the IP provisions, which would require Canada to: induce Internet Service Providers carrying out the function referred to in paragraph 2(c) [providing hosting services] to remove or disable access to material upon becoming aware of a decision of a court to the effect that the… [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
   See, e.g., In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation, 80 F. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am by Jan von Hein
At the second stage, it illustrates that the application of the rule to foreign companies does not infringe the freedom of establishment according to Art. 49, 54 TFEU. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
,” you’re right. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
 In In re John Doe a/k/a “Trooper”, the Texas Supreme Court limited the reach of Rule 202 pre-suit depositions by holding that the trial court in a Rule 202 proceeding must have personal jurisdiction over not only the respondent (the party whose deposition is sought), but, if applicable, also over the subject(s) of the pre-suit investigation about whom the respondent is expected to be deposed. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:28 am by Jane Chong
” In In re Directives, the FISC held that  even where the foreign intelligence exception applies, the government action that intrudes on individual privacy interests must meet the Fourth Amendment reasonableness requirement. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Jan. 30, 2014) (“Actos”); In re Ethicon, Inc. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:53 am by Joel R. Brandes
        The application sought reimbursement for legal services by foreign attorneys, Gomez and Vasu. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Charles Kotuby
Before the holidays, the Southern District of New York decided In re Application of Kreke Immobilien KG (S.D.N.Y. 2013), a case brought in U.S. court under § 1782 to obtain documents from Deutsche Bank for use in a German litigation. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 12:25 pm by Wells Bennett
 For his part, Senior Judge Williams puzzled over the Boumediene court’s use of the word “indefinite. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
(d) the mere discovery of a new form of a known substance which does not result in the enhancement of the known efficacy of that substance or the mere discovery of any new property or new use for a known substance or of the mere use of a known process, machine or apparatus unless such known process results in a new product or employs at least one new reactant. [read post]