Search for: "In re Appraisal of AOL, Inc." Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2018, 6:12 am
Recently in In re Appraisal of AOL Inc., the Delaware Court of Chancery, in an opinion by Vice Chancellor Glasscock, relied solely on its own discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analysis to appraise the fair value of AOL Inc. below the deal price paid in its acquisition by Verizon Communications Inc. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
  Shortly after Vice Chancellor Laster went all-in on the target’s “unaffected market price” as the proper measure of fair value in Aruba Networks, Vice Chancellor Glasscock addressed the fair value issue in In re Appraisal of AOL Inc. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by Edward M. McNally
In RE Appraisal Of AOL Inc., C.A. 11204-VCG (February 23, 2018) This is an important case for its comments on the Dell decision of the Delaware Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:25 am by John Jascob
Not to be outdone by two vice chancellors, whose work applied Delaware Supreme Court precedents, the state’s high court also would affirm the work of one of those vice chancellors in a third case involving SWS Group Inc., where the court also had used the DCF method (In re Appraisal of AOL Inc., February 23, 2018, Glasscock, S.; Merlin Partners LP v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
Aruba Networks, Inc. [1] and In re Appraisal of AOL Inc., [2] and the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Merlin Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The premium over the merger price Regardless of presence of the appraisal arbitrage, the trend in the number of filings of appraisal petitions depends on whether a price higher than the merger price can be expected in the appraisal litigation. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
NuVasive, Inc., No. 15-85 (Commil re-hash – mens rea requirement for inducement) 3. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
The Facts and the Theory     In the suit, Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC ("petitioners"), alleged that Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., and Motorola, Inc. [read post]