Search for: "In re Armstrong (1981)" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2011, 2:39 pm by Christine Dowling
  (In re Lawrence, 44 Cal.4th 1181 (2008))  Had Scherf been a California inmate eligible for discretionary parole, he might very well have been granted early release. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:25 am by Michelle Leder
We’re guessing that the price would be a lot higher now). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
C.P., December Term, 1981, No. 1283 (Bench Op. of Hon. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Supp. 247 (1984), rev’d on other grounds, 816 F.2d 1417 (10th Cir. 1987) In re TMI Litig., 927 F. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
App. 1991), the court barred pharmacist claims.KentuckyHyman & Armstrong, P.S.C. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
Outterson recommended a re-evaluation of the possible use of direct government funding to deal with the issue, and suggested charging generic manufacturers with a fee payable to the company who did all the R&D, including the clinical trials and regulatory approval phases. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]