Search for: "In re Bd. of Certified Court Reporter Examiners"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2007, 2:21 pm
Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Neb. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
If no prohibition exists, [courts] then ask whether the parties in fact agreed to arbitrate the particular dispute by examining their collective bargaining agreement". 5. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
If no prohibition exists, [courts] then ask whether the parties in fact agreed to arbitrate the particular dispute by examining their collective bargaining agreement". 5. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:22 am
REGIONAL BD. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:35 am
The trial went off the rails, with the defense claiming that Schwering’s expert had given testimony inconsistent with his report; the court ultimately granted a mistrial and set the case again. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The second cause of action alleged a failure to recirculate the draft environmental report which required the certification be set aside. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
RE/MAX FIRST CHOICE, LLC, et al., Defendants. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final… [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
This case presents the following issue: When a lead agency performs a subsequent environmental review and prepares a subsequent environmental impact report, a subsequent negative declaration, or an addendum, is the agency’s decision reviewed under a substantial evidence standard of review (Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
At its January 4, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the authority of the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
" The hearing officer also admitted, over the same objections, a precautionary checklist and results of the breath test, and Fenton's unsworn arrest/investigation report. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm
” Analysis and suggestions: While the first sentence of the foregoing proposed addition is helpful, the second sentence (and the rest of the proposed revisions to the section, for that matter) are unnecessary, premature, carry the potential for confusion and conflict with forthcoming California Supreme Court precedent on the subject, and should therefore probably be eliminated. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Gonzalez-Colon Court: U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-1881 September 16, 2011 Judge: Selya Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Medical Malpractice Until 2005, when the Puerto Rico Board of Medical Examiners promulgated a first-in-the-nation regulation that limited the practice of cosmetic medicine to particular classes of medical specialists, all licensed physicians in Puerto Rico could perform cosmetic surgery. [read post]
