Search for: "In re Belt, Petitioner" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 1:02 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The grave risk exception “is to be interpreted narrowly, lest it swallow the rule In re Lozano, 809 F. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:13 am
Sunbio Corporation, Cancellation No. 92067124 [Petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark B-7 for dietary and nutritional supplements, on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with petitioner's identical mark for identical goods, deceptiveness (Section 2(a)), misrepresentation of source (Section 14(3)), fraud, nonuse, and abandonment]. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 5:06 am
SEH International, Ltd., Opposition No. 91252482 [Opposition to registration of AXIO (Stylized) for "Sports equipment, namely, soccer uniforms, namely, shirts and shorts; jackets, pants and sweatshirts, belts for clothing, and socks," in view of the registered mark AX for, inter alia, "Clothing, namely, pullovers, cardigans, sweaters, trousers, skirts, jackets, blouses, shirts, jeans, sweatpants, shorts, sweatshirts, suits, dresses, overcoats, coats, raincoats,… [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:43 pm by Ronald Mann
Echoing the analysis of the U.S. solicitor general, Kagan suggested that it made more sense to regard the provisions as overlapping, in what she described as a “belt-and-suspenders approach where … we’re going to find every possible way to say this thing in order to make sure that fraudulent acts are covered. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by John Elwood
  And witness also the belt-tightening as the Court took up only one new relist this week. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by John Elwood
They’re on the docket for me and you. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 6:30 am by Lucia Veglia
Some I-512 forms are issued to allow for multiple re-entries into the U.S. while others are issued for only one single re-entry. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am by John Elwood
  (If you are already outraged because the Chief Magistrate’s middle name actually contains an “e,” fasten your seat belt: we have more name-vowel weirdness coming before we’re through.) [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:48 am by John L. Welch
" Decision as PrecedentialPrededential No. 34: TTAB Affirms Refusal to Register "Beer Glass and Stand" Packaging for Lack of Distinctiveness Fraud: Precedential No. 36: TTAB Refuses to Find Fraudulent Intent Where Applicant Relied on Advice of CounselPrecedential No. 16: Fraud Claim Survives Motion to Dismiss; Facts Pleaded with Sufficient ParticularityPrecedential No. 2: TTAB Okays Fraud Pleading But Denies Summary Judgment on Intent Issue Genericness: Precedential No. 45: TTAB Finds… [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm by Law Lady
BURNETTE, Appellees. 2nd District.Creditors' rights -- Postjudgment discovery in aid of execution of judgment -- Trial court departed from essential requirements of law by permitting discovery in aid of execution of a final summary judgment which was void -- Summary judgment was null and void where trial court entered it while appeal of a nonfinal order was pendingLORI GIBSON; LESLIE BETTS; MARC BETTS; and LYDIA SIERRA, Petitioners, v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
“Several teachers submitted letters attesting to [petitioner’s] character. [read post]
22 May 2012, 12:11 pm
 Now, they're forced to stick with these stocks until the next sugar high comes along. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Reed re- quested DNA testing on certain evidence, including the belt used to strangle Stites, which Reed contended would help identify the true perpetrator. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm by cdw
Petitioner had a horrendous childhood, with allegations of sexual abuse by the adoptive mother, and he suffered from numerous mental issues. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm by SCOTUStalk
And you can think about that as you frame your arguments, as you draft your briefs, when you’re reading the precedents and you’re looking back at old arguments about what the justices are concerned about and who’s concerned about what and when you’re trying to count to five, which is what you’re trying to do in the Supreme Court. [read post]