Search for: "In re Belt, Petitioner"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2023, 4:10 am
TrafFix, 58 USPQ2d at 1006-07; In re Becton, Dickinson, 102 USPQ2d at 1378; Valu Eng’g, 61 USPQ2d at 1427. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:42 am
[No] TTABlog Test: Is BLACK BELT Confusable with KURO-OBI for Restaurant Services? [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
Going to divorce court can be like going to the mechanic where you go in for an oil change and come out with new timing belt. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
Yes, the Court said: regardless of whether it could order the President to re-appoint Mr. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Reed re- quested DNA testing on certain evidence, including the belt used to strangle Stites, which Reed contended would help identify the true perpetrator. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:02 pm
The grave risk exception “is to be interpreted narrowly, lest it swallow the rule In re Lozano, 809 F. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 5:06 am
SEH International, Ltd., Opposition No. 91252482 [Opposition to registration of AXIO (Stylized) for "Sports equipment, namely, soccer uniforms, namely, shirts and shorts; jackets, pants and sweatshirts, belts for clothing, and socks," in view of the registered mark AX for, inter alia, "Clothing, namely, pullovers, cardigans, sweaters, trousers, skirts, jackets, blouses, shirts, jeans, sweatpants, shorts, sweatshirts, suits, dresses, overcoats, coats, raincoats,… [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 11:17 am
You’re not allowed to hit anyone you’re not related to. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
Answering machines were relegated to Seinfeld re-runs. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm
And you can think about that as you frame your arguments, as you draft your briefs, when you’re reading the precedents and you’re looking back at old arguments about what the justices are concerned about and who’s concerned about what and when you’re trying to count to five, which is what you’re trying to do in the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:13 am
Sunbio Corporation, Cancellation No. 92067124 [Petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark B-7 for dietary and nutritional supplements, on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with petitioner's identical mark for identical goods, deceptiveness (Section 2(a)), misrepresentation of source (Section 14(3)), fraud, nonuse, and abandonment]. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
Argued October 3, 2018—Decided January 15, 2019 Petitioner New Prime Inc. is an interstate trucking company, and respondent Dominic Oliveira is one of its drivers. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:43 pm
Echoing the analysis of the U.S. solicitor general, Kagan suggested that it made more sense to regard the provisions as overlapping, in what she described as a “belt-and-suspenders approach where … we’re going to find every possible way to say this thing in order to make sure that fraudulent acts are covered. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
We hold these petitioners do have the habeas corpus privilege. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:56 am
Don’t tell me this is all to protect the EPO against terrorists – it is a laughable proposition that the current “security checks” might intimidate, let alone stop a bunch of terrorists with machine guns or explosive belts. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
“Several teachers submitted letters attesting to [petitioner’s] character. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:41 am
Their arms and legs with the belt. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
They’re on the docket for me and you. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:14 am
Maybe they’re right. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co., 461 F.3d 844 (7th Cir. 2006) (affirming summary judgment in disparate treatment discharge case, and noting judicial tendency to require “comparability” between plaintiffs and comparison group as a “natural response to cherry-picking by plaintiffs”); Miller v. [read post]
