Search for: "In re Burrus" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2014, 2:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
” Since the Supreme Court’s 1890 decision in In re Burrus, it has been understood that the federal courts lack jurisdiction over at least some issues of “domestic relations” law. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 4:46 am by Lyle Denniston
That notion dates all the way back to a Supreme Court decision in 1890 in the case of In re Burrus. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 5:01 am by Emma Broches, Julia Solomon-Strauss
But this doesn’t mean that we’re including only violent crimes. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
  Richard Re covered the decision for this blog, with commentary from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View and Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am by Larry Joseph
The domestic-relations exception to federal jurisdiction derives from the Constitution’s and federal statutes’ limiting the judicial power to cases in law and equity Reflecting our federal structure, in which the states remain sovereign in the spheres not delegated to the federal government, the Supreme Court’s 1890 In re Burrus decision recognized a “domestic-relations” exception to federal jurisdiction: “The whole subject of the domestic… [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am by Steven Calabresi
” – In re Burrus (1890) “[W]hile rare instances arise in which it is necessary to answer a substantial federal question that transcends or exists apart from the family law issue, in general it is appropriate for the federal courts to leave delicate issues of domestic relations to the state courts. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by Lyle Denniston
” It went on to note that the exception had been extended by the court in an 1890 decision, In re Burrus, to child custody disputes. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
Every oral argument and judicial ruling, going back over a year now, prompts a new round of press releases and re-jiggering of briefs for the next case.  [read post]