Search for: "In re COX"
Results 261 - 280
of 936
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 pm
Gov’t Letter Br. 14, In re Brunetti, No. 15-1109,Docket No. 60 (Fed. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
Instead, as former SEC Chair Chris Cox put it, Section 162(m) “deserves a place in the museum of unintended consequences. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 7:25 am
"Despite [defendant's] repeated attempts to broaden the court's claim construction, the court declines to re-cast its earlier constructions to encompass broad limitations to ATM technology to 'the invention' or 'the patents' or to add additional limitations, such as 'connection-oriented,' to the claims. . . . [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 1:45 am
While Polk easily defeated the Whig candidate, Henry Clay, in 1844, Harding’s margin of victory over James Cox was the largest ever at the time, since the two-party system began. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
Meanwhile, Cox’s successor, Leon Jaworski, followed in Cox’s footsteps, much to Nixon’s chagrin. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 9:47 am
The Problems With Proposals to Blindly Apply Offline Regulation to Online Speech We’re still in the early stages of this latest round of policymaking. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
By Adam Cox, Marty Lederman and Cristina RodriguezOne month ago, on September 5, the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, rescindeda June 2012 memorandum issued by her predecessor, Secretary Janet Napolitano, which had established the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, commonly known as “DACA. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:06 am
We agree: we're not so much worried about what SESTA will do to Google; we're much more worried about what will happen to the next Google. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 6:58 pm
., September 14, 2017) (setting aside Labor Commission order denying Cox's workers' compensation claim: the Commission applied the incorrect legal standard, since aggravation of a preexisting condition suffices to establish medical causation in an industrial case)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 1:59 pm
At best, they’re useful as an aid to human moderators, enforcing standards that are transparent to the user community. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:00 am
We’re sure to see more litigation over this wordplay. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
LON SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 7:44 am
In the redistricting context, Cox v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 6:30 am
The other exception is cases such as the one involving Cox that looks at major ISPs. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
Borrowing again from Delaware law, the court explained that “Delaware courts interpreting” a similar statute “have concluded that it provides that only disinterested shareholders votes may be considered” in ratification of a board decision (citing In re Cox Communications, Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 5:58 am
If you thought that we are in an era of the triumph of property rights, that must be a different Congress you’re thinking of. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm
” Cambodian philanthropist Geraldine Cox has filed a defamation claim against a Canberra law student after they posted a Facebook comment which was critical of her work. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 7:24 pm
See “Demonstration of Frye Gatekeeping in Pennsylvania Birth Defects Case” (Oct. 6, 2015); In re Zoloft Prod. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:16 pm
This post examines a recent opinion from the Court of Appeals of Ohio – Eighth District: State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am
I will make your life difficult professionally, because what you’re doing is outrageous. [read post]
