Search for: "In re COX" Results 301 - 320 of 965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2008, 12:38 pm
"If you're slandering, you can be sued whether you have a blog or not," says Cox, a blogger himself. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 6:53 am
"There's no expense to operating an Amber Alert system if you're doing it the right way. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:56 am by Broc Romanek
In a challenge to a controlling stockholder's proposed freeze-out transaction (a first-step tender offer followed by a second-step short-form merger), the Court applied a standard derived from In re Cox Communications, Inc. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 1:56 pm
We're no experts in naming monkeys, but "Richard" seems like a horrible monkey name. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:29 am by Jason Poblete
If you’re too young to remember the Cox China Report, follow this link. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 12:02 pm
But since we're in the world of politics, it's worth noting that FDIC head Sheila Bair is doing very well out of this crisis; better, I would warrant, than Christopher Cox, in that it looks like she's actually participating in shaping the government response. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 9:44 am by Tobias Thienel
Vooght [1999] BPIR 376, 387 [CA, per May LJ])The same principles are recognised in the legal orders of the Republic of Ireland (Cox v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 6:15 am
And let this be a message to all those who would put children in harm's way - we're watching you," Cox concluded.A criminal charge is merely an accusation, and defendants are presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.Prior to this weekend's joint sting operation, Cox's Child and Public Protection Unit has arrested 158 Internet Sexual predators. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:02 am by SHG
In the murders of transgender people, they’re slightly worse. 55% rather than 59%. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Cox case is alarming b/c takedown notices were often so bogus that © claims got dismissed, but they’re still held liable for ignoring bogus notices. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
If the SEC elects to bar access while it debates a new rule on the issue, Buenrostro warned, "what you're left with is a step backwards that becomes the law. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:51 am by Venkat
(See also the Cox case from last month: "Facebook Posting That Someone Has Herpes Is Criminal Harassment--Pennsylvania v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:06 am by elliot
We agree: we're not so much worried about what SESTA will do to Google; we're much more worried about what will happen to the next Google. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
If they think animals should have the right of copyright they're free, I think, under the Constitution, to do that. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]