Search for: "In re COX"
Results 421 - 440
of 935
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2010, 7:32 pm
“You’re incarcerated and you’re innocent, you shouldn’t be there. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am
Last week, after more than a year of drafting following oral argument, and nearly two years after the original District Court order, a Third Circuit panel (Chief Judge Scirica and Judges Fisher and Greenberg) issued their magnum opus on pleading Section 1 antitrust violations after Twombly and RICO Act "enterprises" after Boyle in the consolidated Multi-District Litigation In re: Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 8:21 am
“They go after the weaker links, and they are having significant success in that regard,” Cox said. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:04 am
"I guess I would just ask that you stay tuned with regard to these and know that we're thinking about them. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 8:43 am
Specifically, we’re looking for schemes or abuses that might be more far-reaching than the individual cases brought through the FINRA arbitration process. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
” Calls to modify or repeal Section 230 also re-emerged after major tech platforms banned President Trump. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:43 am
In general, a woman with an uncomplicated pregnancy is unlikely to need anything more than the types of “accommodations” most of us take for granted, like drinking water when we’re thirsty or sitting down when we need to rest our legs. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming article in the North Carolina Law Review, Victoria J. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 9:30 am
They’re not. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Cox has since left the state to receive a legal abortion. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
Cox is a good case: they failed to enforce even a toothless repeat infringer policy.Professor Rebecca Tushnet, Frank Stanton Professor of the First Amendment, Harvard Law SchoolDownload TestimonyI would like to start with some perhaps surprising numbers that illustrate what §512 has meant for creativity and innovation online. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
As Cox puts it, "the Internet's decentralized, packet-switched architecture," through which every individual website is "imm [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
As Cox puts it, "the Internet's decentralized, packet-switched architecture," through which every individual website is &qu [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
Cox appeals. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:58 am
Unless the Commission retracts the memo (they're scheduled to meet on Friday), a possibility that might lie somewhere between ain't gonna happen and no way in hell will it happen, it's a flat-out shutdown. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
“As a teacher you’re kind of a public figure, you’re considered a role model,” Clark said, “and if you put this type of material in a public forum where it can be found you’re kind of asking for trouble. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
Cox; In re Kaleb K.) [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 6:51 am
If it doesn’t, nothing stops future requesters from re-litigating this issue. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Similarly, in Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
