Search for: "In re COX" Results 141 - 160 of 1,095
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2012, 2:56 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG [2012] EWCA Civ 854 (25 June 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Vallen International Limited v Lewis & Anor [2012] EWHC B5 (QB) (25 June 2012) AXN & Ors v Worboys & Ors [2012] EWHC 1730 (QB) (25 June 2012) The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor, R (on the application of) v Environment Agency [2012] EWHC 1643 (QB) (20 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) SMP Trustees Ltd, Re… [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 10:51 am by Idaho State Police
She had exited the vehicle to assist Taylor and then re-entered the Pontiac and was seated. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 6:24 am
"On 27 January 1970, two days after returning to the UK,Lennon woke up with the beginnings of a song inspired by his conversations with Cox and Kendall.... [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 9:17 am by Moria Miller
Supreme Court 2001), establishing the right of obstetrical patients to refuse non-consensual drug testing; In Re R.B.F. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:44 pm by James Bingham
Police only recently arrested Zeinen-Cox for the accident. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Meanwhile, Cox’s successor, Leon Jaworski, followed in Cox’s footsteps, much to Nixon’s chagrin. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Symposium on Adam Cox and Cristina Rodriguez, The President and Immigration Law (Oxford University Press, 2020).Peter M. [read post]
30 May 2013, 6:45 am by Broc Romanek
Delaware Chancery's Latest on Business Judgment Rule Unification: In Re MFW Shareholders Here's news from Greenberg Traurig's Cliff Neimeth: In by far the most direct statement on the subject to date, Delaware Chancellor Strine held yesterday - in In Re MFW Shareholders - that, in the context of a controlled company's take private by its parent (controller), the business judgment rule standard of judicial review will apply, and not "entire fairness" review , where at the outset… [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 8:50 pm by Sme
 Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC (10th Cir., November 18, 2016) (reversing dismissal of Palzer's suit for failure of timely service, instead of giving him opportunity to effect service under federal law)*Lister v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 7:25 am by Docket Navigator
"Despite [defendant's] repeated attempts to broaden the court's claim construction, the court declines to re-cast its earlier constructions to encompass broad limitations to ATM technology to 'the invention' or 'the patents' or to add additional limitations, such as 'connection-oriented,' to the claims. . . . [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 6:58 pm by Sme
., September 14, 2017) (setting aside Labor Commission order denying Cox's workers' compensation claim:  the Commission applied the incorrect legal standard, since aggravation of a preexisting condition suffices to establish medical causation in an industrial case)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:48 am
O.K., we know we’re not an AI blog but we had to get that off our chests. [read post]